Started By
Message

re: Arizona religious bill that angered gays vetoed

Posted on 2/27/14 at 1:41 am to
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72360 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 1:41 am to
quote:

So I take it you would still support the bill if the discrimination happened to be racially or gender slanted?
I'd support the bill if it didn't specify any groups and allowed businesses to discriminate for whatever reasons they wanted.

Businesses that only serve gingers? A-ok.

Businesses that only serve blacks? A-ok.

Businesses that refuse to serve males? A-ok.

I could keep going, but I think you get the point.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63721 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 8:20 am to
quote:

I'd support the bill if it didn't specify any groups and allowed businesses to discriminate for whatever reasons they wanted.

Businesses that only serve gingers? A-ok.

Businesses that only serve blacks? A-ok.

Businesses that refuse to serve males? A-ok.

I could keep going, but I think you get the point.


within a year or so we'd have at least some of the same problems we had during jim crow. i know people to young to remember firsthand think that couldn't possibly happen, but they'd be wrong.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram