- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Missouri Bill Would Warn Parents of Evolution Boogeyman
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:33 pm to emcee422
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:33 pm to emcee422
Since evolution is false, telling children there is no proof of it and that it is only a theory is a good idea.
You might want to read Professor Thomas Nagle's ( NYU ) newest book ( he's an atheist ) Mind Cosmos : Why the Materialist Neo Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False.
Or you might want to hear 30 year old words of Richard Leaky, the worlds leading fossil-anthropologist has to say about the “supposed link ” Lucy.
He said in 1983 that Lucy's skull is so incomplete that most of it is imagination made offend plaster paris, and that no firm conclusion could be drawn about what species Lucy belonged to.
THERE GOES YOUR SUPPOSED LINK.
You might want to read Professor Thomas Nagle's ( NYU ) newest book ( he's an atheist ) Mind Cosmos : Why the Materialist Neo Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False.
Or you might want to hear 30 year old words of Richard Leaky, the worlds leading fossil-anthropologist has to say about the “supposed link ” Lucy.
He said in 1983 that Lucy's skull is so incomplete that most of it is imagination made offend plaster paris, and that no firm conclusion could be drawn about what species Lucy belonged to.
THERE GOES YOUR SUPPOSED LINK.
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:37 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
quote:
Since evolution is false, telling children there is no proof of it and that it is only a theory is a good idea.
You might want to read Professor Thomas Nagle's ( NYU ) newest book ( he's an atheist ) Mind Cosmos : Why the Materialist Neo Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False.
Or you might want to hear 30 year old words of Richard Leaky, the worlds leading fossil-anthropologist has to say about the “supposed link ” Lucy.
He said in 1983 that Lucy's skull is so incomplete that most of it is imagination made offend plaster paris, and that no firm conclusion could be drawn about what species Lucy belonged to.
THERE GOES YOUR SUPPOSED LINK.
I love you. You're the best.
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:40 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
quote:
THERE GOES YOUR SUPPOSED LINK.
Well done sir.
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:51 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
quote:
Professor Thomas Nagle
PHD in Philosophy. His thoughts on evolution are irrelevant. You don't go to a Lawyer for brain surgery. Find a PHD in Biology and I'll listen.
quote:
Richard Leaky, the worlds leading fossil-anthropologist
According to who?
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:56 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
quote:
You might want to read Professor Thomas Nagle's ( NYU ) newest book ( he's an atheist ) Mind Cosmos : Why the Materialist Neo Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False.
Or you might want to hear 30 year old words of Richard Leaky, the worlds leading fossil-anthropologist has to say about the “supposed link ” Lucy.
He said in 1983 that Lucy's skull is so incomplete that most of it is imagination made offend plaster paris, and that no firm conclusion could be drawn about what species Lucy belonged to.
THERE GOES YOUR SUPPOSED LINK.
And here we go
Posted on 2/21/14 at 2:23 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
quote:I've talked with Richard Leakey. His father happens to be a scientist I idolized as a kid. I would be stunned if your attribution remotely represents any statement Richard Leakey ever made, or intended to make.
He said in 1983 that Lucy's skull is so incomplete that most of it is imagination made offend plaster paris, and that no firm conclusion could be drawn about what species Lucy belonged to.
One of the things that fascinated me when I got to see some of Louis Leakey's discoveries, is what an accurate picture he and his team developed from the fragments they found. Make no mistake, based on subsequent findings, his extrapolations were dead on, as were those pertaining to Lucy. Some iteration of that is likely what RL was acknowledging.
No doubt though, Richard Leakey is a man confident enough in his work, that he is willing to acknowledge what he doesn't know, e.g., exact path to sapiens. Itis the same approach to science I advocate here.
Posted on 2/21/14 at 2:26 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
quote:
S.E.C. Crazy
You and darkhorse take legitimate scientific criticism and somehow extrapolate that to a critique of evolutionary theory as a whole. It is an insult to the scientists you quote.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News