Started By
Message

re: Missouri Bill Would Warn Parents of Evolution Boogeyman

Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:33 pm to
Posted by S.E.C. Crazy
Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
7905 posts
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:33 pm to
Since evolution is false, telling children there is no proof of it and that it is only a theory is a good idea.

You might want to read Professor Thomas Nagle's ( NYU ) newest book ( he's an atheist ) Mind Cosmos : Why the Materialist Neo Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False.

Or you might want to hear 30 year old words of Richard Leaky, the worlds leading fossil-anthropologist has to say about the “supposed link ” Lucy.

He said in 1983 that Lucy's skull is so incomplete that most of it is imagination made offend plaster paris, and that no firm conclusion could be drawn about what species Lucy belonged to.

THERE GOES YOUR SUPPOSED LINK.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116379 posts
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Since evolution is false, telling children there is no proof of it and that it is only a theory is a good idea.

You might want to read Professor Thomas Nagle's ( NYU ) newest book ( he's an atheist ) Mind Cosmos : Why the Materialist Neo Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False.

Or you might want to hear 30 year old words of Richard Leaky, the worlds leading fossil-anthropologist has to say about the “supposed link ” Lucy.

He said in 1983 that Lucy's skull is so incomplete that most of it is imagination made offend plaster paris, and that no firm conclusion could be drawn about what species Lucy belonged to.

THERE GOES YOUR SUPPOSED LINK.


I love you. You're the best.
Posted by emcee422
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2012
478 posts
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

THERE GOES YOUR SUPPOSED LINK.


Well done sir.
Posted by Haughton99
Haughton
Member since Feb 2009
6124 posts
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Professor Thomas Nagle


PHD in Philosophy. His thoughts on evolution are irrelevant. You don't go to a Lawyer for brain surgery. Find a PHD in Biology and I'll listen.

quote:

Richard Leaky, the worlds leading fossil-anthropologist


According to who?

Posted by LSUSaintsHornets
Based Pelican
Member since Feb 2008
7309 posts
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

You might want to read Professor Thomas Nagle's ( NYU ) newest book ( he's an atheist ) Mind Cosmos : Why the Materialist Neo Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False.

Or you might want to hear 30 year old words of Richard Leaky, the worlds leading fossil-anthropologist has to say about the “supposed link ” Lucy.

He said in 1983 that Lucy's skull is so incomplete that most of it is imagination made offend plaster paris, and that no firm conclusion could be drawn about what species Lucy belonged to.

THERE GOES YOUR SUPPOSED LINK.


And here we go
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124346 posts
Posted on 2/21/14 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

He said in 1983 that Lucy's skull is so incomplete that most of it is imagination made offend plaster paris, and that no firm conclusion could be drawn about what species Lucy belonged to.
I've talked with Richard Leakey. His father happens to be a scientist I idolized as a kid. I would be stunned if your attribution remotely represents any statement Richard Leakey ever made, or intended to make.

One of the things that fascinated me when I got to see some of Louis Leakey's discoveries, is what an accurate picture he and his team developed from the fragments they found. Make no mistake, based on subsequent findings, his extrapolations were dead on, as were those pertaining to Lucy. Some iteration of that is likely what RL was acknowledging.

No doubt though, Richard Leakey is a man confident enough in his work, that he is willing to acknowledge what he doesn't know, e.g., exact path to sapiens. Itis the same approach to science I advocate here.
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 2/21/14 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

S.E.C. Crazy



You and darkhorse take legitimate scientific criticism and somehow extrapolate that to a critique of evolutionary theory as a whole. It is an insult to the scientists you quote.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram