re: Anti-First Amendment Rights LGBT activist decry Kansas new law

I am not sure about all this but the way I read it that any kind of business cannot discriminate according to sexual preference or wedding.

I guess all this is doing is putting sexual orientation in a class with no discrimination by race or religion. or am I reading all this wrong?

or is the issue that some want to retain the right to discriminate? I guess if tou are a business serving the public who can't discriminant. Look at a bakery case in Iowas months ago.

or am I missing something?

quote:

---

You do realize that a wedding is an event and suing someone for not wanting to participate in your event because of their religious reasons is a right. It is not, a right of yours to then ask them such questions as you posted, is it? If what people do in the bedroom is supposed to be private, then don't tell people you are getting married to someone of the same sex. It's no longer private and others have the right to not cater to your event because of the first amendment.

---

this law also would allow a restaurant to refuse service to a gay couple, but i wonder if they would refuse service to me and a date knowing i am gonna rail her later, and their christian restaurant is helping me do it.