- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:58 am to The Baker
quote:
What is to stop the owner of a competing private judicial system from winning a lawsuit in his own court if he is guilty of wrong doing?
For one, I don't think the opposing party would be interested in hearing a case in the owner's court.
Not to mention that said owner would lose significant business if it was known that the arbitration proceedings in said court were less than trustworthy.
This post was edited on 2/5/14 at 1:00 am
Posted on 2/5/14 at 1:05 am to The Baker
quote:
What is to stop the owner of a competing private judicial system from winning a lawsuit in his own court if he is guilty of wrong doing
If I'm suing someone for violating my property rights and that said person owned an arbitration firm, why would I take my case to his court?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)