Started By
Message

re: Wage inequality and women

Posted on 2/3/14 at 10:49 am to
Posted by PrettyBird
Aspen
Member since Feb 2010
10361 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 10:49 am to
The person who posted said they noticed a trend of every 28 days... I would take that as every month, if a trend was able to be detected?

Maybe I'm just not sissy like all these women apparently are... and I don't miss work for trivial reasons.
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 10:54 am to
quote:

The person who posted said they noticed a trend of every 28 days... I would take that as every month, if a trend was able to be detected?


Couple things to keep in mind, this was an Italian company, and the sick time they are given over there is typically a lot more than we Americans are used to.

Furthermore, a person doesn't have to take the sick day EVERY 28 days for a trend to be detected. They could take a sick day for 2 consecutive cycles, not take a sick day for 1 cycle, then do it for 3 consecutive cycles, not take it for 2, take it for 1, not take it for 1, take it for 3, not take it for 1...etc. And an analysis would still be able to determine a trend.

This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 10:55 am
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67601 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 10:56 am to
quote:

The person who posted said they noticed a trend of every 28 days...


well it did say "pretty regularly" I take that as not every month but it could be

quote:

Maybe I'm just not sissy like all these women apparently are... and I don't miss work for trivial reasons


I have dated a few that would miss work quite often for cramping. I don't think it was the cramps but they were just lazy and looking for an excuse to stay home.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram