Started By
Message

re: If you always wanted a 1911 but could only have one handgun for eternity.....

Posted on 1/27/14 at 2:30 pm to
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38402 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

It doesn't perform any better than a good 9mm


Yes it does, if we're talking ft. pounds of energy
9mm is more popular for civilians because the recoil isn't as bad, but the 40 has more power

quote:

cost a lot more to shoot


3 cents per round more on the low end (1.50 more for a box of 50), 40 ammo is very affordable
This post was edited on 1/27/14 at 2:32 pm
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
25196 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 2:52 pm to
I can buy +P ammo in a 9mm and get very close to the same ballistics as a .40.



Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11924 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

9mm is more popular for civilians because the recoil isn't as bad, but the 40 has more power


The "power" difference is marginal.

In the grand scheme of things, with modern hollow point ammo, 9, 40, and 45 are all about the same. Will 1mm or 2mm in width make that big of a difference? I don't think it will, but if someone thinks it will then he or she should carry a 40 or a 45.

Will the extra bullet weight make a difference? Maybe... but 45 is considerably slower than 9mm. So if you take into account the heavier, slower 45 compared to the lighter, faster 9mm, the difference equals out. 40 S&W is the middle ground.

The difference in these rounds that is apparent is magazine capacity. I carry 9mm concealed because I get the most rounds possible. You can fit more 9mm in the same sized magazine. There's nothing wrong with carrying fewer rounds in a larger 40/45 caliber at all. It's just something to consider.

If you are forced to use FMJ ammo like the military is (but civilians should never use it for SD) then 45 would obviously be the best choice since it would make the biggest hole. When talking about expanding ammo, they're all about the same. It comes down to personal preference.

Now, when you get into the 10mm-357mag range, things change a bit because those have a very discernible difference in muzzle energy compared to your standard service calibers.

So, to sum up, carry what you practice with the most often. That will increase your chances of your fight or flight reactions saving your life one day.

And for the OP, if you want a gun that's fun to shoot and can also be carried some of the time, the SR1911 Commander would do fine with the right holster. Granted it is heavy, but it is also an extremely fun range gun. When shooting 45, nothing compares to the 1911.

The Shield will carry better but won't be as fun at the range. It will be more comfortable to carry though so there's a scale you have to weigh these options on.

So, for me, I'd probably get the 1911 since it almost fills the full size handgun role while also being slightly shorter. But if I wanted a dedicated carry gun, the Shield would be a better option.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram