- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Shrink the military? Can right and left agree on this?
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:32 pm to asurob1
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:32 pm to asurob1
quote:Chinas not losing ground. However, they're not innovators. They primarily engage in theft and then recreate weapons platforms and systems. So they perpetually lag. But in a few years they will have enough assets in place to be a real threat to Taiwan. Their standoff weapons will be robust enough to give our carrier groups fits. It's a dynamic we've never faced from them, and it will be interesting.
Both are a decade or so behind us and losing ground.
1
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:36 pm to asurob1
quote:
Frankly the only real threat is the Chinese (more so then their crazy cousins the North Koreans). I'm about half convinced they are willing to go to war over some empty islands.
They'll bitch and moan, but the thing is we have China by the balls and vice versa. People bitch and complain about owing money to China, but they're investing in us because of our foreign presence and investment in their country. The money they invest in us is going right back in their system. They don't expect a cent to be paid directly back to them. If the US and China go to war, expect economic collapse of both countries.
Despite the fact that hippies hate corporations, they are the key to world peace. Or should I say trade is the key to world peace. You can't hate corporations and love world peace.
This post was edited on 1/24/14 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:39 pm to zeebo
Is there still a legit threat to America?
Operations in OEF/OIF under covered plots, money trails, and active terrorist cells to perform numerous attacks on American soil. If a small military presence in Kuwait and North Africa can still prevent future attacks, politicians need to cut the DA Civilian force.
If a military presence in the Middle East and North Africa does no good what so ever and GWOT will officially end at the end of this year, then yes, downsizing must occur like at the end of every other previous war the U.S. has ended.
As a Combat Vet, I'd hate to see us lose ground we'll just have to go retake in 5-10 years...
Operations in OEF/OIF under covered plots, money trails, and active terrorist cells to perform numerous attacks on American soil. If a small military presence in Kuwait and North Africa can still prevent future attacks, politicians need to cut the DA Civilian force.
If a military presence in the Middle East and North Africa does no good what so ever and GWOT will officially end at the end of this year, then yes, downsizing must occur like at the end of every other previous war the U.S. has ended.
As a Combat Vet, I'd hate to see us lose ground we'll just have to go retake in 5-10 years...
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:41 pm to kingbob
quote:
Ah, the Fauklands: little rocks mean nothing until it turns out there's oil under and around them
Nobody knew that in 1980 ;-).
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:42 pm to sammyptiger
quote:
Chinas not losing ground. However, they're not innovators. They primarily engage in theft and then recreate weapons platforms and systems. So they perpetually lag. But in a few years they will have enough assets in place to be a real threat to Taiwan. Their standoff weapons will be robust enough to give our carrier groups fits. It's a dynamic we've never faced from them, and it will be interesting.
Until the Chinese can deploy a blue water navy.
Not a threat.
They are working on a carrier killer missile but who knows how legit that will be if it is ever deployed.
They remain a regional threat and nothing more.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:43 pm to CajunSoldier225
quote:
As a Combat Vet, I'd hate to see us lose ground we'll just have to go retake in 5-10 years...
Yeah I hate that as well. If we had just taken care of business in 91...a lot of good men would still be with us.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:45 pm to asurob1
quote:
They remain a regional threat and nothing more.
A regional threat in those parts is an international threat. Those two countries fighting over those damn islands are the number 2 and 3 economies in the world. They may bitch and moan about the land, but they're not going to go to the point of war.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:46 pm to asurob1
quote:You're idea of a threat is to myopic. They can accomplish their main goal-bolstering their position in the region while severely diminishing ours in the region-juts by retaking Taiwan.
Not a threat.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:50 pm to CajunSoldier225
quote:
As a Combat Vet, I'd hate to see us lose ground we'll just have to go retake in 5-10 years...
All of the costs associated with gaining that ground are sunk costs. It is a shame how much it cost us. The question is, are those gains worth the carrying costs to keep it? Are the consequences of giving that ground up worth it?
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:50 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
A regional threat in those parts is an international threat. Those two countries fighting over those damn islands are the number 2 and 3 economies in the world. They may bitch and moan about the land, but they're not going to go to the point of war.
Someone Just Said Something About The Japan-China Conflict That Scared The Crap Out Of Everyone Read more: https://www.businessinsider.com/china-japan-conflict-could-lead-to-war-2014-1#ixzz2rNmwLc8U
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:52 pm to sammyptiger
quote:
You're idea of a threat is to myopic. They can accomplish their main goal-bolstering their position in the region while severely diminishing ours in the region-juts by retaking Taiwan.
Until the Chinese develop a blue water navy.
Not a threat.
Do you the the 7th Fleet is going to sit idly while the People's navy makes steam towards Taiwan?
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:53 pm to asurob1
quote:You need to research this a bit more. No steam is needed.
Do you the the 7th Fleet is going to sit idly while the People's navy makes steam towards Taiwan?
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:54 pm to asurob1
quote:
Someone Just Said Something About The Japan-China Conflict That Scared The Crap Out Of Everyone Read more: LINK
What can I say, I'm an optimist that the world wide economic ramifications will keep the two from fighting. The two countries loathe each other and that land is utterly worthless, and lets hope for once the UN does something to prevent a war.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:57 pm to sammyptiger
quote:
You need to research this a bit more. No steam is needed.
Common guys, this is the 21st century battle field.
Planes, ships and paratroopers...all have to mass somewhere.
That sort of thing gets noticed and damn quickly.
There will never be another "surprise" attack ala Pearl Harbor again.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:58 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
The two countries loathe each other and that land is utterly worthless, and lets hope for once the UN does something to prevent a war.
Oh I agree, but I never underestimate the stupidity of national pride. I'm knee deep in Max Hasting's 1914 right now.
Small things strung together created a giant fricking mess rather quickly.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:03 pm to asurob1
I just find it funny how most of America can't tell the two countries apart, aside from the fact that one has a big wall and is communist and the other was nuked and had suicide pilots. Bet a ridiculously pathetic portion of the population could only tell me those two things, with sushi being the only other thing they'd get right about their differences.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:05 pm to asurob1
quote:
Do you the the 7th Fleet is going to sit idly while the People's navy makes steam towards Taiwan?
In 2014, I'd say yes. The Taiwan Relations Act, of 1979, does not create an obligation on the part of the US to defend Taiwan, and I doubt Obama has any interest in committing the US to defend Taiwan.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:08 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Bet a ridiculously pathetic portion of the population could only tell me those two things, with sushi being the only other thing they'd get right about their differences.
Sadly I'd bet you'd be right.
Hell most Americans can't tell you where all the states of our own country are located.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:10 pm to CarrolltonTiger
quote:Wow. You really are naieve.
The Taiwan Relations Act, of 1979, does not create an obligation on the part of the US to defend Taiwan, and I doubt Obama has any interest in committing the US to defend Taiwan.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:10 pm to CarrolltonTiger
quote:
In 2014, I'd say yes. The Taiwan Relations Act, of 1979, does not create an obligation on the part of the US to defend Taiwan, and I doubt Obama has any interest in committing the US to defend Taiwan.
Obama Shifts Navy to Pacific
You'd be wrong.
This post was edited on 1/24/14 at 11:11 pm
Page 4 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News