Started By
Message

re: SSCI Benghazi report details how "demonstration" incl. in CIA talking points

Posted on 1/15/14 at 2:08 pm to
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
28719 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 2:08 pm to
Seems to be a more current assessment:

quote:

Individuals affiliated with terrorist groups, including AQIM, Ansar al-Sharia, AQAP, and the Mohammad Jamal Network, participated in the September 11, 2012, attacks. Intelligence suggests that the attack was not a highly coordinated plot, but was opportunistic; however, well-armed attackers easily overwhelmed the Libyan security guards and the five U.S. Diplomatic Security agents present at the Temporary Mission Facility. It remains unclear if any group or person exercised overall command and control of the attacks or whether extremist group leaders directed their members to participate. Some intelligence suggests the attacks were likely put together in short order, following that day's violent protests in Cairo against an inflammatory video, suggesting that these and other terrorist groups could conduct similar attacks with little advance warning.

The FBI's investigation into the individuals responsible for the Benghazi attacks has been hampered by inadequate cooperation and a lack of capacity by foreign governments to hold these perpetrators accountable, making the pursuit of justice for the attacks slow and insufficient. As a result, key information gaps remain about the potential foreknowledge and complicity of Libyan militia groups and security forces, the level of pre-planning for the attacks, the perpetrators and their involvement in other terrorist activities and the motivation for the attacks.

Posted by CITWTT
baton rouge
Member since Sep 2005
31765 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 2:15 pm to
So you are saying that Congressional Intelligence committees did not get the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth in their briefings over Benghazi when they published their findings? You have to appear in a dictionary under the heading of hackery and hacks. Wasn't it Diane Fienstien that said the NYT article and their denial of Al queda involvement on the matter was prime Bull shite just a few days ago?
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Intelligence suggests that the attack was not a highly coordinated plot, but was opportunistic; however, well-armed attackers easily overwhelmed the Libyan security guards and the five U.S. Diplomatic Security agents present at the Temporary Mission Facility.
It's disappointing to find out an opportunistic mob is more capable of responding to events than our military costing hundreds of billions annually. Our paid professionals were incapable of responding to an emergency that the people on the ground had warned about.

How do you spin that one?
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
35161 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 3:56 pm to
*Investigation*, my arse. All they had to do was interview (what was left) of the people that were there.

'If you want to keep you health play, you can. Period!'

Get a grip D. That propaganda will go nowhere here. And even it the continue for a time...just gonna bring us to an economic crash and bloody revolt. :beatdeadhorse:
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram