Started By
Message

re: Military FPS Games Need New Blood

Posted on 1/9/14 at 10:14 am to
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123827 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 10:14 am to
Seriously, where does Battlefield even go next. The last 3 have been set in modern times (I think). There's only so much you can add. If you go to the future that opens up so many question marks. It may be time to go back to WWII.

With that said I'm going to pickup my BF4 copy.
This post was edited on 1/9/14 at 10:18 am
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 10:19 am to
Probably to Bad Company. I think they tried to do too much with BF4. Less is more sometimes. Like the specializations...it's kinda complicated and people really don't even know how or what they do.

Instead of eliminating them and making it simpler, they just went ahead and muddied it all up and made it derpier.
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30237 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

Seriously, where does Battlefield even go next. The last 3 have been set in modern times (I think). There's only so much you can add. If you go to the future that opens up so many question marks




ETA: They need to revert back WWII or Vietnam. Hell, they have a Medieval "FPS" out now (Chivalry). Why not give the Civil War a run?
This post was edited on 1/9/14 at 2:22 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram