- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Military FPS Games Need New Blood
Posted on 1/9/14 at 10:14 am to The Sad Banana
Posted on 1/9/14 at 10:14 am to The Sad Banana
Seriously, where does Battlefield even go next. The last 3 have been set in modern times (I think). There's only so much you can add. If you go to the future that opens up so many question marks. It may be time to go back to WWII.
With that said I'm going to pickup my BF4 copy.
With that said I'm going to pickup my BF4 copy.
This post was edited on 1/9/14 at 10:18 am
Posted on 1/9/14 at 10:19 am to hg
Probably to Bad Company. I think they tried to do too much with BF4. Less is more sometimes. Like the specializations...it's kinda complicated and people really don't even know how or what they do.
Instead of eliminating them and making it simpler, they just went ahead and muddied it all up and made it derpier.
Instead of eliminating them and making it simpler, they just went ahead and muddied it all up and made it derpier.
Posted on 1/9/14 at 2:20 pm to hg
quote:
Seriously, where does Battlefield even go next. The last 3 have been set in modern times (I think). There's only so much you can add. If you go to the future that opens up so many question marks
ETA: They need to revert back WWII or Vietnam. Hell, they have a Medieval "FPS" out now (Chivalry). Why not give the Civil War a run?
This post was edited on 1/9/14 at 2:22 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News