- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Budget comparisons between St George & other Louisiana cities
Posted on 1/9/14 at 11:49 am to Elcid96
Posted on 1/9/14 at 11:49 am to Elcid96
quote:
My guess is they wouldn't mind paying more, if they actually got something in return and saw a better use of their tax dollars. Why is this so hard to understand.
EXACTLY!! I will pay more if I have to. That doesn't matter. A few hundred dollars a thousand what does it matter. If I have to pay 10-15k a year to send my kid to school I will gladly accept the increase tax trade off over what private schools would cost. A good public school is a lot cheaper on my wallet then private school. What is the argument against that? That is all that has been said to oppose this. Tax tax tax like that's supposed to scare the voters away. It's not going to, so stop being annoying.
Posted on 1/9/14 at 12:03 pm to ThreauxDown11
quote:LSURussian will say that is fine, but at the same time say that those proposing the new city are flat out lying to us and are deceiving us which they are not.
EXACTLY!! I will pay more if I have to. That doesn't matter. A few hundred dollars a thousand what does it matter. If I have to pay 10-15k a year to send my kid to school I will gladly accept the increase tax trade off over what private schools would cost. A good public school is a lot cheaper on my wallet then private school. What is the argument against that? That is all that has been said to oppose this. Tax tax tax like that's supposed to scare the voters away. It's not going to, so stop being annoying.
BTW, I feel the same way you do and don't even have any kids and never will. I'm just tired of seeing everyone leave.
Posted on 1/9/14 at 12:12 pm to ThreauxDown11
Even the most conservative suburban districts usually get behind taxes to support local schools if necessary.
Posted on 1/9/14 at 12:12 pm to ThreauxDown11
quote:You're referring to school costs and we're not even talking about those. We're only referring to the costs of running a new city government, not a new school system. The new school system will cost even more in increased taxes. (Just look at what Zachary did when they started their new district.) Plus, a new school system is far from guaranteed even if there is a new city created.
r. A few hundred dollars a thousand what does it matter. If I have to pay 10-15k a year to send my kid to school I will gladly accept the increase tax trade off over what private schools would cost.
And it won't be 'a few hundred a thousand...." It will cost anyone with a $250,000-$300,000 home a couple thousand dollars more a year, forever, for the new property taxes. And that applies to the residents who don't have children or no children of school age.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News