- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Was Jennings really that bad?
Posted on 1/2/14 at 12:05 pm to Brbengal
Posted on 1/2/14 at 12:05 pm to Brbengal
I laugh at posters trying to pin part of the problems on the weather. Really? Man, that was a super slick ball Beckham dealt with one handed in a very awkward position to make a catch. It killed DB's for both teams trying to make interceptions. Hawkeye QBs couldn't even hold onto the ball....not really. Hell the weather was so bad Hill and to slip and slide his way to 216 yards on a terribly soft and muddy field...no, it was a pretty solid surface Hill was burning up. The weather, IMO, had very little impact on the performance of any QB in the game especially as the game got past the first Q.
I think AJ will be fine, but he really needs to work on his intermediate and deep balls, dude puts way too much air under the ball which is going to make his accuracy suffer and allow DBs to close before the ball arrives. It's obvious he didn't have the chemistry with the receivers that Mett had, but Mett didn't have that in game one as a starter, either. I'm not wasting time worrying about his bowl game performance when there is much more on the line this afternoon affecting future team competitiveness.
I think AJ will be fine, but he really needs to work on his intermediate and deep balls, dude puts way too much air under the ball which is going to make his accuracy suffer and allow DBs to close before the ball arrives. It's obvious he didn't have the chemistry with the receivers that Mett had, but Mett didn't have that in game one as a starter, either. I'm not wasting time worrying about his bowl game performance when there is much more on the line this afternoon affecting future team competitiveness.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News