Started By
Message

re: College Football Playoff using top 4 Conference winners: BCS era

Posted on 12/17/13 at 12:10 am to
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59161 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 12:10 am to
quote:

When you look at those listed criteria that makes it a long shot for an at large who didn't win their conference to make the field


those criteria are just guidelines, not mandates and frankly I have no problem with them. If you want to give the nod to Baylor because Baylor won their conference, and Bama didn't I don't see why that would be a problem. BCS supporters want the regular season to matter, so who would making Auburn play Bama twice in 3 games not diminish the regular season? Keep in mind that Auburn had to play an extra game, which had they lost would have knocked them out, while Bama sits at home and gets in? How is that fair?

What the committee can do is put teams like 2003 OU, 1998 KState or 2001 Tenn in despite those teams being upset in CCG.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36155 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 12:13 am to
quote:

When you look at those listed criteria that makes it a long shot for an at large who didn't win their conference to make the field


those criteria are just guidelines, not mandates and frankly I have no problem with them.


I don't have a problem with them either. What they need to do is be clear more than anything. If they want to have a system, have a system that people understand.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram