There's a whole lot of that's the way it is, life isn't fair, law of the land nonsense in this thread. I hate to think where we would be as a nation if we approached all our social issues with the such logic.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by NoHoTiger

So many to kill, so little time

Member since Nov 2006

45762 posts

Posted on 11/8/13 at 1:45 pm to TheFolker

quote:
I hate to think where we would be as a nation if we approached all our social issues with the such logic.

So, what is your answer? How do you make this particular issue more equitable? I've asked this before and no one has answered me. Would it be more equitable if the man were the one to decide whether or not the woman has an abortion? Is it ok for him to deny the abortion and then also to decline to support the child?

I personally am OK if the man wants to sign away his parental rights if the woman decides to have the child and he doesn't want it. He walks away with no support payments and she keeps the kid.

What is the answer, in your estimation?

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by upgrayedd

Lifting at Tobin's house

Member since Mar 2013

135180 posts

Posted on 11/8/13 at 1:47 pm to TheFolker

quote:
There's a whole lot of that's the way it is, life isn't fair, law of the land nonsense in this thread. I hate to think where we would be as a nation if we approached all our social issues with the such logic.

Well, this argument:

quote:
Because life isn't fair. What is your answer?

usually only applies if you're a woman because men have had a carte blanche lifestyle for thousands of years.

Women only want "equality" when they feel they are in a disadvantaged position.

1 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board