Started By
Message

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected

Posted on 10/21/13 at 4:42 pm to
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67309 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 4:42 pm to
The difference is exponential. 20 seconds is 3 pass attempts, a spike, and a field goal attempt. It would make for a long shot, but it would be a shot. It bumps LSU's chances up from .1% to probably around 20%.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84537 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

around 20%.


20 seconds with no timeouts and you think we win 1 out of 5?
Posted by tigermoney
Member since Oct 2008
366 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

The difference is exponential. 20 seconds is 3 pass attempts, a spike, and a field goal attempt. It would make for a long shot, but it would be a shot. It bumps LSU's chances up from .1% to probably around 20%.


do you seriously believe this? seriously? no way you seriously believe this.
Posted by Akit1
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2006
7648 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 5:07 pm to
Going 45 yards in 20 something seconds is not absurd
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56953 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

The difference is exponential. 20 seconds is 3 pass attempts, a spike, and a field goal attempt. It would make for a long shot, but it would be a shot. It bumps LSU's chances up from .1% to probably around 20%.


No.

You aren't getting 4 productive plays. That is ridiculous.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram