Started By
Message

re: Springfield vs. Colt - talking 1911s

Posted on 9/11/13 at 10:15 am to
Posted by Jma313
Member since Aug 2010
5157 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 10:15 am to
quote:

If you're using your sidearm in combat your enemies are probably doing a little too well. But I can't argue with the 100+ years of combat history the Glock has going for it...wait, that's not right.


In combat I want the following: reliability, large ammunition capacity and a decent caliber cartridge. The 1911 is a great pistol however it is not as reliable as say a glock, they always have feeding and jamming issues. They only hold 7+1, sorry for me in combat I would want a .45 that can hold 15+1. Glock, Springfield, sig, S&W all have semi-auto pistols that can do this better than a 1911
Posted by LSUTiger205
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Aug 2006
10820 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 11:08 am to
quote:

in combat I would want a .45 that can hold 15+1. Glock, Springfield, sig, S&W all have semi-auto pistols that can do this better than a 1911


Well, if you were in combat you better enjoy that Beretta 92 then.
Posted by Nodust
Member since Aug 2010
22636 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 11:10 am to
quote:

In combat I want the following:

a radio to call in air strike
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram