- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Springfield vs. Colt - talking 1911s
Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:47 pm to LSUnowhas2
Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:47 pm to LSUnowhas2
When I was in the market for a 1911 a salesman at Jims let me hold feel and rack the slides on any gun they had. When it came down to it I was between a colt special combat government and the springfield trp. The special combat government was the more expensive of the two and compared to the trp was unbelievably sloppy for fit. He said my gut instinct was right and between the two it was no contest. Fwiw he didn't know if I was buying from him or not and in the end I didn't because they wanted over 1800 out the door for the trp. Would have been about 2-300 more for the colt if memory serves me correct.
Posted on 9/10/13 at 8:22 pm to LouisianaChessie
quote:
The special combat government was the more expensive of the two and compared to the trp was unbelievably sloppy for fit.
That "sloppy fit" is intentional for combat handguns. They're designed to function even if some dirt//sand//crud//blood gets in the action of the gun.
The loose tolerances are a huge benefit in terms of building a reliable weapon. But for those seeking a range gun that will be uber-accurate, the "sloppy fit" is a negative. It all depends on what you think you'll use the gun for.
The high-end, high dollar Kimbers, Nighthawks, Wilsons and Baers will impress your friends. A Glock will impress your enemies.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News