Started By
Message
locked post

All the talk about returning starters

Posted on 8/2/13 at 7:18 am
Posted by GA Tiger
Woodstock
Member since Aug 2005
3121 posts
Posted on 8/2/13 at 7:18 am
Much of the pre-season speculation about LSU's upcoming season is based on having to replace 7 of 11 starters on defense. Last night, I attended an event and one of the guys who spoke commented on this. He wasn't referring to LSU specifically but teams like LSU, who lost several starters. He said it doesn't mean a whole lots because with the difference "packages" defensive coordinators use, lots of players play. He said the returning starters deal strictly refers to the guys who played the first play of the game. This gives me a little more hope that LSU's defense may not suffer as bad as some think it will.
Posted by Noon the Great
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2013
228 posts
Posted on 8/2/13 at 7:52 am to
I know 5 year olds who could have told you this
Posted by eelsuee
2B+!2B
Member since Oct 2004
4508 posts
Posted on 8/2/13 at 8:17 am to
quote:

He said the returning starters deal strictly refers to the guys who played the first play of the game.
While technically true, they are almost always the best player at their position. Which means their loss will be felt more often than not.
Posted by TIGRLEE
Northeast Louisiana
Member since Nov 2009
31493 posts
Posted on 8/2/13 at 8:19 am to
When your starters admit to taking plays off what's it matter?
Posted by harry coleman beast
Left Field
Member since Aug 2008
52210 posts
Posted on 8/2/13 at 8:22 am to
All the starters who left made their names in 2011. Our new starters will be motivated to make a name for themselves this year. Our defense will be better than last year.
Posted by TDsngumbo
Alpha Silverfox
Member since Oct 2011
43099 posts
Posted on 8/2/13 at 8:26 am to
Posted by sunnydaze
Member since Jan 2010
30682 posts
Posted on 8/2/13 at 8:28 am to
Defense will be solid, not dominant, but top 15
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
32929 posts
Posted on 8/2/13 at 8:33 am to
I'll go out on a limb and say that you probably could have figured that out on your own.
Posted by beauchristopher
new orleans
Member since Jan 2008
67329 posts
Posted on 8/2/13 at 8:36 am to
The offense virtually returns everyone. So glad Copeland came back. and they upgraded at receiver.

To me that is more important because LSU has the talent to replace on the Defensive side. I believe it's easier bc of said packages and all that talent combined with speed.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18716 posts
Posted on 8/2/13 at 8:39 am to
This isn't exactly a secret. LSU rotates heavily on defense. Most of the new "starters" have seen significant playing time. For example, Ego and Freak probably played about a 3rd of the snaps on the D-line last year.

Even at safety, Ronald Martin played and I believe even had a pick or two.

The bigger issue this year is that our experienced depth is low. However, after the first few games that should be sorted out.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
13863 posts
Posted on 8/2/13 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Much of the pre-season speculation about LSU's upcoming season is based on having to replace 7 of 11 starters on defense. Last night, I attended an event and one of the guys who spoke commented on this. He wasn't referring to LSU specifically but teams like LSU, who lost several starters. He said it doesn't mean a whole lots because with the difference "packages" defensive coordinators use, lots of players play. He said the returning starters deal strictly refers to the guys who played the first play of the game. This gives me a little more hope that LSU's defense may not suffer as bad as some think it will.


No shite?
Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
53427 posts
Posted on 8/2/13 at 12:27 pm to
I'm not saying this year's DL was better than last years DL... But we will get better performances out of them than 2012.... Book that.


These guys get a ton of playing time and the best player doesn't always start. For a player to outright jump an already established name like Sam Montgomery or Barkevious Mingo, they have to be substantially better.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84204 posts
Posted on 8/2/13 at 2:18 pm to
Oh, for shite's sake.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram