- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/29/13 at 1:18 pm to LouisianaChessie
EMP is too tall.
Height is very important. I carry in my boot sometimes and too tall of a grip makes the gun hard to fit. Ruger SR40c looks good too.
Height is very important. I carry in my boot sometimes and too tall of a grip makes the gun hard to fit. Ruger SR40c looks good too.
Posted on 7/29/13 at 1:19 pm to Bleeding purple
quote:
SR40c
Is a double stack. Check out the M&P9c if you're willing to go double stack.
Posted on 7/29/13 at 1:58 pm to LouisianaChessie
quote:
Is a double stack. Check out the M&P9c if you're willing to go double stack.
Yep. The SR40c is a double stack.
But it is nearly dimensionally identical to my SR9c. The only real difference is that the slide is slightly beefier. So that may add a little less than an inch in height.
I think the XDs or Shield will do the trick just fine. I also really like my Kahr CM9, which is also made in a CM40 and CM45. But it doesn't have any safety features - just a long trigger.
Posted on 7/29/13 at 3:02 pm to Yat27
quote:
quote: Springfield XDs Closest thing to covering his checklist that I can think of...
Plus they are relatively easy to find now too.
Posted on 7/29/13 at 3:25 pm to Bleeding purple
quote:
ygm btw bapple
Got her.
Posted on 7/29/13 at 3:30 pm to oleyeller
quote:
sig p938
I know its easy to carry but it it not easy on the hands to shoot. You can barely get two fingers on the grip.
Posted on 7/29/13 at 3:41 pm to mikeytig
I know no one buys those for range guns, but size matters for ease of use. Seems like if you were going to get into a shite situation armed you'd want something with a positive grip and super easy controls, or at least something you've practiced with a ton.
This post was edited on 7/29/13 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 7/29/13 at 10:29 pm to Bleeding purple
quote:
Prefer at least one manual safety along with an intergraded grip safety.
If by this you mean the gun should have a grip safety, ala the 1911, then your choices are basically limited to the Springfield XDs series or the 1911. To get a light weight 1911, you'll have to go w/ an alloy frame. Doing so will cost additional $$. I know that Kimber and S&W make alloy frame 1911's and I'm sure there are others.
If indeed the safety issue is negotiable, you can look at the S&W Shield (no grip safety), Beretta Nano, Kimber Solo, Ruger LC9 and Walther PPS. The Kahr series (CM9, CW9, CW45) would be good choices except they have neither an external safety lever nor a grip safety.
I handled my first XDs (it was the 9mm) last Thurs in Monroe and was impressed. It fit my hand very well. Looked like a quality gun. The blued version was $600 while the bi-tone was $660.
Posted on 7/29/13 at 10:38 pm to Bleeding purple
Bp,, i sure like my new little LC9,,, feels good in pocket and hand,,
But, i havent read the thread yet,,,,
But, i havent read the thread yet,,,,
Posted on 7/29/13 at 10:47 pm to Ole Geauxt
As usual a plethora of good advice. I need to go hold and shoot some guns in this new list.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 8:48 am to Bleeding purple
The XDs would be perfect for you. No manual safety, but it does have the grip safety and the trigger safety.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News