Started By
Message

re: Drew Brees vs. Kurt Warner (At their Best)

Posted on 7/27/13 at 9:18 pm to
Posted by MrFreakinMiyagi
Reseda
Member since Feb 2007
18969 posts
Posted on 7/27/13 at 9:18 pm to
Brees, and it's not close.

Warner was always overrated trash. If he is not surrounded by top 1-2 receiving corps, he's damn near useless.

Tampa Bay slowed down the Rams in '99, and had they had a even a mediocre offense that year, they beat them.
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27454 posts
Posted on 7/27/13 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

Warner was always overrated trash. If he is not surrounded by top 1-2 receiving corps, he's damn near useless.


Posted by LL012697
Member since May 2013
3963 posts
Posted on 7/27/13 at 11:51 pm to
quote:

Brees, and it's not close.

Warner was always overrated trash. If he is not surrounded by top 1-2 receiving corps, he's damn near useless.

Tampa Bay slowed down the Rams in '99, and had they had a even a mediocre offense that year, they beat them.


Lol, dude, brees was trash in San Diego...if the saints didn't take a chance on him because they essentially had nothing
to lose at the time, it's quite likely he'd have been out of football almost a decade now. Instead, he benefitted from falling into a great offensive system and has thrived on it, but don't act as if he's been a world beater his whole career, he hasn't.

And the answer to the original question is Warner...at his best kI'm not sure I've seen anyone better, but brees has had the better career obviously
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram