- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Advocate columnist Matthew Harris believes Hill is done at LSU
Posted on 7/9/13 at 11:13 am to LSUdm21
Posted on 7/9/13 at 11:13 am to LSUdm21
quote:
What he was originally charged with has NO BEARING in the eyes of the court.
Is this in theory or in practice?
Is there discretion allowed on the part of the prosecutor or the judge on this. Or are they strictly forbidden to consider the original charge?
I honestly don't know the answer. In the big picture, I would hope they would be able to consider the original charge in these kinds of cases. At the same time, I'd hate to see Hill get crucified here too.
3
Posted on 7/9/13 at 11:18 am to CourseyCorridor
quote:
Or are they strictly forbidden to consider the original charge?
Seriously? You can't use something a person isn't even charged with against him/her in a court of law. It's pretty much common sense.
Posted on 7/9/13 at 11:21 am to CourseyCorridor
quote:
In the big picture, I would hope they would be able to consider the original charge in these kinds of cases.
What???
Posted on 7/9/13 at 11:25 am to CourseyCorridor
quote:
I would hope they would be able to consider the original charge in these kinds of cases. At the same time, I'd hate to see Hill get crucified here too.
These are contradictory statements.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News