- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2013 NBA Draft Thread | Pelicans acquire Jrue Holiday and Pierre Jackson
Posted on 6/27/13 at 9:00 pm to DCBJR6
Posted on 6/27/13 at 9:00 pm to DCBJR6
quote:
They've compared next year to '03. After Wade went at 5 it was:
Kaman
Hinrich
Ford
Sweetney
Hayes
Pietrus
Collison
Banks
Ridnour
That's 6-14. Are any of those players at that time + Noel better than Jrue? No.
That's the biggest reach for an argument point I've ever seen.
"A" for effort though. Very creative.
quote:
I like number 1. You don't think we slide in the playoffs or close to it next year? You harping on draft picks, but were getting someone good who can lead the team AND is young. I understand your talking but this is a great trade.
I am of the mindset that being a borderline playoff team is not a good thing concerning getting new talent via the draft.
As far as free agents, New Orleans isn't Miami, Boston, New York, Brooklyn, Dallas or Los Angeles. We don't have that flash to attract certain players.
We would really have to shell out some $$$ and wow potential free agents BIG TIME to score someone that would come here over those other places and organizations.
Not hating on New Orleans, but we are at a disadvantage when it comes to flash, team history, etc... We carry that stupid small market stigma.
This post was edited on 6/27/13 at 9:03 pm
Posted on 6/27/13 at 9:05 pm to dcrews
quote:
That's the biggest reach for an argument point I've ever seen.
"A" for effort though. Very creative.
Seriously? You can't have a grown up debate without being a little smart arse?
But anyways, how exactly is that a bad point? The point is that they talk about how deep '03 is and how '14 will be so deep, but does "very deep" really mean anything outside of the top 5? Looking at '03, no.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)