- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Homebrewing: In-Process Thread
Posted on 11/19/14 at 9:04 am to s14suspense
Posted on 11/19/14 at 9:04 am to s14suspense
I ended up transferring a lot of trub into the fermenter because it was getting late and I was cold and ready to wrap things up.
I decided to read up again on the brulosopher's rub experiment to make myself feel better about all this. The following is from his findings on a cream ale:
The bolded statement has me particularly happy if it happens in my batch as well.
Now the question becomes whether or not this extra material will affect dry hopping, and whether I should rack it to a secondary before dry hopping. His beer sat on the trub for a total of 13 days. My beer would be on it for a minimum of 18. Does that extra time make a difference? Enough to justify the O2 exposure during racking?
I dunno
I decided to read up again on the brulosopher's rub experiment to make myself feel better about all this. The following is from his findings on a cream ale:
quote:
My Impressions: In the multiple times I’ve sampled both of these beers, I’ve regularly come to the same conclusions, namely that Truby is clearer with more noticeable hop aroma and a perceptibly enjoyable crispness. Like some of the others who have compared these beers, I agree that Non-Truby has a smoother flavor, slightly less biting, but all things considered, I actually find myself pulling the tap handle for Truby more often than Non-Truby.
The bolded statement has me particularly happy if it happens in my batch as well.
Now the question becomes whether or not this extra material will affect dry hopping, and whether I should rack it to a secondary before dry hopping. His beer sat on the trub for a total of 13 days. My beer would be on it for a minimum of 18. Does that extra time make a difference? Enough to justify the O2 exposure during racking?
I dunno
This post was edited on 11/19/14 at 9:20 am
Posted on 11/19/14 at 9:18 am to LoneStarTiger
quote:
Now the question becomes whether or not this extra material will affect dry hopping, and whether I should rack it to a secondary before dry hopping.
I wonder about this as well sometimes. Listened to a brewstrong about double dry hopping and they thought some of the need for that was just because of the conical shaped fermenters limiting surface area of hop to liquid contact once they piled up in the bottom.
A lot of people rack to secondary for dry hopping. If you're putting a ton in there it's probably not a bad idea.
Posted on 11/19/14 at 10:02 am to LoneStarTiger
I dry hop in the primary.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News