- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who was the better Coach, Dinardo vs. Archer, my first post
Posted on 6/21/13 at 12:45 pm to lsuallsportsfan
Posted on 6/21/13 at 12:45 pm to lsuallsportsfan
quote:
Not sure there is a clear answer,
It's no contest for DiNardo. Recruiting is far and away the most important part of college coaching and DiNardo could recruit. He left Saban with some decent talent. When Hallman took over for Archer, the talent at LSU was embarrassingly low.
Where you could debate is who was worse out of Archer and Hallman, but DiNardo was much, much better than either.
This post was edited on 6/21/13 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 6/21/13 at 12:47 pm to H-Town Tiger
Dinardo without question.
Posted on 6/22/13 at 9:17 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:Absolutely disagree with this. It's only half the equation. The other half is taking maximum advantage of the talent you now have and making them play to their true potential via creative play calling. There's been a long run of (offensive) talent-squandering in recent years at LSU. And don't give me that 10-Win BS.
Recruiting is far and away the most important part of college coaching and DiNardo could recruit.
This post was edited on 6/22/13 at 10:19 am
Posted on 6/22/13 at 1:20 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
Where you could debate is who was worse out of Archer and Hallman, but DiNardo was much, much better than either.
this. if he could have picked asst.s he would have had a long career at lsu.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News