Started By
Message

re: MLB viewership down 30%...should they juice the ball?

Posted on 6/20/13 at 10:26 pm to
Posted by GaBassFisher92
Dublin, Georgia
Member since Nov 2012
3145 posts
Posted on 6/20/13 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

This is the correct answer. Cut it down to about 90


And if they cut it to 90 the people that don't watch it will still complain about too many games. Reducing the number of games would be a disaster for the MLB, they would anger many traditionalists and people that don't watch baseball still aren't going to watch baseball.

With the money Major League Baseball is getting from ticket sales plus mammoth TV deals, why should the MLB reduce the amount of games? Heck, with expansion plus the introduction of interleague play that has occured since the MLB increased the games from 154 to 162 you can make the case that there aren't enough games.
Posted by Georgia Peach
Denham Springs
Member since Jun 2013
299 posts
Posted on 6/20/13 at 10:30 pm to
Personally I think they should drop back to 154 games a year and speeding up game by 10-15 minutes by not allowing pitcher/hitter time outs
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28151 posts
Posted on 6/20/13 at 10:31 pm to
tonights tid bit

quote:

The top three winning percentages in MLB are all in the National League Centra
Posted by JabarkusRussell
Member since Jul 2009
15825 posts
Posted on 6/20/13 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

they would anger many traditionalists


Where were the traditionalists when they added games and added 2 Wild Cards? They won't leave.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram