- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Goodell defends Redskins name
Posted on 6/13/13 at 4:31 am to The7Sins
Posted on 6/13/13 at 4:31 am to The7Sins
UGA fan, opinion not relevant (jk).
The Indians logo is far more offensive than the Redskins logo or name imo, as it is a racist caricature of what white people in the early 1900s believed Native Americans looked like.
The Indians logo is far more offensive than the Redskins logo or name imo, as it is a racist caricature of what white people in the early 1900s believed Native Americans looked like.
1
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:41 am to DMV Cock
I agree the logo should be changed for Cleveland. But the name should stay as Indians is not a racist term.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News