Started By
Message

re: Lets talk about americas lack of interest in soccer

Posted on 5/29/13 at 3:38 am to
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
66040 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 3:38 am to
It's just painfully boring to try and watch.

I mean there's what, 4-7 shots on goal on average in most games? I think the USA had 1 shot on goal against Mexico back in March in a 0-0 draw.

Yeah, a 0-0 tie between the US and Mexico is sure to get the sport going in this country.

Our sports have shot clocks to prevent them from getting boring, multiple "scores" per game especially in the NFL anymore which is pretty much an air raid attack and high scoring.

Baseball is slow, but even still the best pitchers in the game usually allow 2-3 runs per start and they only start once every 5 days. Other times you got guys that give up 3-5+ earned run average =, enough to keep interest.

Hockey you're going to get 2-3 goals usually minimum with the way the game is now, but more importantly there is 1 timeout all game, and very few stops in play, resulting in 25+ shots on goal per game and the better teams 30-40 shots on goal giving you constant action.

Basketball has a shot clock to keep the pace up decently and obviously a ton of shots, momentum swings, high flying dunks, etc.

If soccer took away offsides and maybe took away 2 players from each team on the field to open it up more, maybe, only maybe would I consider sitting through a match.
This post was edited on 5/29/13 at 3:40 am
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32894 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 3:44 am to
Yeah if soccer could get to where there where like even 1/3 as many scoring opportunities as in hockey it would be way more entertaining.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18990 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 4:48 am to
quote:

If soccer took away offsides and maybe took away 2 players from each team on the field to open it up more, maybe, only maybe would I consider sitting through a match.


That exist.

Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 6:48 am to
quote:

If soccer took away offsides and maybe took away 2 players from each team on the field to open it up more, maybe, only maybe would I consider sitting through a match.

If you do this, you would really have to make the field smaller. Also, taking away offside would not make it better.

I think the real question is, why do Americans only pay attention to goals? Some of the best soccer games I've watched have ended 0-0.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425882 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 8:10 am to
quote:

I mean there's what, 4-7 shots on goal on average in most games? I think the USA had 1 shot on goal against Mexico back in March in a 0-0 draw.

Yeah, a 0-0 tie between the US and Mexico is sure to get the sport going in this country.

and this kind of sums of a great deal of the problem in a nutshell

soccer is not egalitarian, and it doesn't strive to be. there is also context/history a lot of 'murkans miss

Mexico rarely loses and doesn't tie often in Mexico City. a tie there is impressive. Mexico is also much better than the US, so a tie is really good. we bunkered and played defense and eliminated their advantage. it was a good game

quote:

If soccer took away offsides

this would make it worse, but people who don't understand soccer LOVE to bring this up as a solution

never fails
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram