Started By
Message

re: Eric Bledsoe's Trade Value

Posted on 4/25/13 at 1:26 pm to
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34519 posts
Posted on 4/25/13 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

not a very valuable skill for a PG.


Neither is rebounding, but Greivis rebounds at a very similar rate. Another thing that Bledsoe is not "better at."

Okay, you asked me, now i get to ask you, aside from defense, where is Bledsoe quantifiably better than Vasquez?
This post was edited on 4/25/13 at 1:29 pm
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63753 posts
Posted on 4/25/13 at 1:31 pm to
What u mean quantifiable? Huh?








Don't mind me. Had a liquid lunch and waiting on check.
Posted by drake20
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
13123 posts
Posted on 4/25/13 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

Neither is rebounding, but Greivis rebounds at a very similar rate. Another thing that Bledsoe is not "better at."


Based on their heights, I'd argue that Bledsoe is actually a better rebounder. He can initiate breaks and increase pace off rebounds way better than Vasquez...We should be running--young team, Davis and Anderson are very good break players.

quote:

Neither is rebounding


maybe, but it's a lot more valuable than post D as a PG.

quote:

Okay, you asked me, now i get to ask you, aside from defense, where is Bledsoe quantifiably better than Vasquez?


Quantifiably, he has lower numbers in everything cause he plays 14 less minutes, but he does have a higher FG%, 3PT%, and PER.

He can play defense/create turnovers and get to the bucket a lot better than Vasquez. His defense is an elite skill. His offense is coming along. He's athletic and coordinated--no physical limitations as a PG.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram