I agree. Almost no way you can keep GV. Roberts is cheap and proving to do well. Bledsoe should be priority for Dell. Big time over Burke. Upgrade through trade or FA at PG. Picking Burke isn't much of an upgrade defensively. Will still have the same issues on perimeter defending. And a slight upgrade offensively.

Don't be surprised if Dell goes Oladipo or even trades up for him. Dell was at a lot of IU games. And him and Monty are said to be very upset with the perimeter defense because we cannot stop opposing guards. Burke doesn't help that situation.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by supe12sta12z

Tiger Town

Member since Apr 2012

10478 posts

Posted on 4/17/13 at 3:02 pm to BarbaricPelican

Why would a PG who has no pick and roll ability be priority for Demps?

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by teke184

Zachary, LA

Member since Jan 2007

96453 posts

Posted on 4/17/13 at 3:07 pm to BarbaricPelican

quote:
I agree. Almost no way you can keep GV. Roberts is cheap and proving to do well. Bledsoe should be priority for Dell. Big time over Burke. Upgrade through trade or FA at PG. Picking Burke isn't much of an upgrade defensively. Will still have the same issues on perimeter defending. And a slight upgrade offensively.

Don't want Bledsoe. Roberts kept ripping him a new a-hole the other night when he started in place of Vasquez.

I don't particularly like trading Vasquez given that he is only making $2.1m next year and we are unlikely to get any assets of note for him.

If we get a late lottery pick from Dallas or a decent non-lottery pick from Utah or Milwaukee, I could go for a Vasquez trade. I don't see us getting that much for him, though, and certainly don't see a player picked around those spots bringing as much to the table as he does.

2 ...

Report Post

Pelicans Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board