- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts
Posted on 6/26/19 at 8:31 am to bluebarracuda
Posted on 6/26/19 at 8:31 am to bluebarracuda
86 vs. 80 in Assassin's Creed and 143.3 vs. 134.7 in Final Fantasy XV. Those aren't really that significant of a difference especially when you consider the 9900k is almost a $500 CPU while the 3600 is a $200 CPU, and the lowest end on the new Ryzen 3xxx stack (without IGP) with the lowest clocks.
Far Cry obviously heavily favors Intel CPUs and the ryzen gets crushed there.
What's going to be most interesting is seeing the whole product stack in gaming compared to intel counterparts among a ton of different games.
Far Cry obviously heavily favors Intel CPUs and the ryzen gets crushed there.
What's going to be most interesting is seeing the whole product stack in gaming compared to intel counterparts among a ton of different games.
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 12:16 pm
1
Posted on 6/26/19 at 8:56 am to thunderbird1100
7% and 13% difference isn't remotely close to being "on-par" though.
Still waiting to see more in-depth benches like 99%, low fps, etc throughout more games
Still waiting to see more in-depth benches like 99%, low fps, etc throughout more games
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News