- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 1:27 pm to Hammertime
Posted on 9/20/17 at 1:27 pm to Hammertime
Are those quadro cards that much better at rendering than say a 1080 ti?
I think one of the upper end Ryzen chips (1800x and up) would be a perfect sweet spot for you in terms of price/performance
I think one of the upper end Ryzen chips (1800x and up) would be a perfect sweet spot for you in terms of price/performance
2
Posted on 9/20/17 at 1:34 pm to bluebarracuda
quote:
Are those quadro cards that much better at rendering than say a 1080 ti?
Guess he wants DP for Solid Works?
Posted on 9/20/17 at 1:58 pm to bluebarracuda
Only Quadro and Firepro are compatible and supported by SW and ANSYS. A GeForce would be unstable, and has been found to be many times.
Most CAD programs are designed for Intel chips IIRC. Looking at benchmark tests, Intel almost always beats AMD. That's why I wanted to stick with Intel.
I also don't do much rendering. It's usually only drawing parts, assembling, and running various simulations.
Most CAD programs are designed for Intel chips IIRC. Looking at benchmark tests, Intel almost always beats AMD. That's why I wanted to stick with Intel.
I also don't do much rendering. It's usually only drawing parts, assembling, and running various simulations.
This post was edited on 9/20/17 at 2:01 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News