- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BIG10 reaching out to UVA,UNC & Georgia Tech
Posted on 2/19/13 at 3:55 pm to hiltacular
Posted on 2/19/13 at 3:55 pm to hiltacular
Right now. Yes. But that same money from bundled packages will not be there in the future genius. That is my argument and my point...
Eta: if you can't see the current backwards cable model of today I'm clearly wasting my time here
Eta: if you can't see the current backwards cable model of today I'm clearly wasting my time here
This post was edited on 2/19/13 at 3:57 pm
Posted on 2/19/13 at 4:08 pm to rocket31
I fail to see how the conferences get screwed in your hypothetical scenario where no one is willing to pay for tv anymore.
Conference expansion leads to more money now, why should the conferences give a shite about what tv packages will be worth 15 years from now?
Unless you are saying conference expansion will prevent them from making more down the road for whatever reason and I would be interested to hear how you think they can make more by not expanding.
I do agree that the money you can make off of TV will never be greater than what it is right now but you could definitely debate that. Who knows what value adding the playoff will bring.
Conference expansion leads to more money now, why should the conferences give a shite about what tv packages will be worth 15 years from now?
Unless you are saying conference expansion will prevent them from making more down the road for whatever reason and I would be interested to hear how you think they can make more by not expanding.
I do agree that the money you can make off of TV will never be greater than what it is right now but you could definitely debate that. Who knows what value adding the playoff will bring.
This post was edited on 2/19/13 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 2/19/13 at 4:26 pm to rocket31
quote:
Derp. Obviously The teams at the top can still be good. Why add poverty schools to that mix? Maryland? Rutgers? Lmao I was Lmao
well that's been explained ad nausem. That you don't agree with the business model is fine, that you think it's outdated is also fine, but even if you are right, which I'm not 100% sure I agree, it will be years before that happens. There will still be demand for college sports and someone will pay for it.
quote:
Like I said... that trend exists for a reason... And so do the projections of future TV packages
the reason the trend exists is that there are people opting out of cable, that doesn't mean everyone will in the next 10 years. I'm not so sure it will be cheaper to go ala carte for everything. I find it somewhat amusing that people whine and complain about paying $80 for cable, but will pay more than that for smart phne plans and another $40-50 for internet service. You have to get the content to your devise somehow, so if cable goes away, they can shift and we are talking years down the road anyway.
This post was edited on 2/19/13 at 4:30 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)