- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Re-ranking 2010 recruiting classes based on production
Posted on 2/12/13 at 3:19 pm to tiggerthetooth
Posted on 2/12/13 at 3:19 pm to tiggerthetooth
My quick take is that it makes since to give A&M extra credit because two guys should be early draft picks and they got a lot of top quality players that start, but just because a class contained several starters (Auburn) if that team isn't good then so what???
Also if Cam was a great get for Auburn that year (and I believe he was), how can you demote LSU and the HOney Badger because he only played two years when Cam pnly played one????
The top classes should contain the top players in the draft and on the all america and all conference teams. Classes that just contain a lot of kids who started on poor to average teams mean very little.
Also if Cam was a great get for Auburn that year (and I believe he was), how can you demote LSU and the HOney Badger because he only played two years when Cam pnly played one????
The top classes should contain the top players in the draft and on the all america and all conference teams. Classes that just contain a lot of kids who started on poor to average teams mean very little.
0
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News