Started By
Message

re: Why is this an Inappropriate Avatar Pic???

Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:28 am to
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
27568 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:28 am to
quote:

He was suggesting that someone probably RA'd it for being offensive (The bloody nose and missing mouth would be creepy and offensive to a Kindergartner, hence his comment). Does that spell it out enough for you?

how does that suggesting help? it doesn't explain how an Admin came to the conclusion that it was indeed "inappropriate." Whether someone RA'd or not is inconsequential.
Posted by InVolNerable
Member since Jan 2012
10204 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

Whether someone RA'd or not is inconsequential.


No it's not. An admin probably just revoked the image to avoid having to deal with repeated RA's from Kindergartener-like posters that found it inappropriate/offensive. They themselves might not have even found it to be so. It wouldn't be the first time it's been done.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram