- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Paging Daylower---duck hunting question
Posted on 1/22/13 at 10:06 am to Bleeding purple
Posted on 1/22/13 at 10:06 am to Bleeding purple
quote:
Bleeding purple
Everybody knows the federal law, the way its written is retarded, but for the sake of argument lets make a kind of hypothetical scenario.
BP goes out and shoots ducks for 6 days, limits each day, cleans the ducks, puts them in the freezer.
Somewhere along the way BP turns outlaw and theres enough evidence of outlawing deer or something stacked up against him for a search warrant. GW searched BP's house/freezer and finds all the ducks along with say a couple illegal deer.
BP ends up being ticketed/jailed for over possession limit ducks, and the for the illegal deer. Makes sense(kind of)?
Posted on 1/22/13 at 10:10 am to brass2mouth
quote:
Somewhere along the way BP turns outlaw and theres enough evidence of outlawing deer or something stacked up against him for a search warrant. GW searched BP's house/freezer and finds all the ducks along with say a couple illegal deer.
How often does this happen?
Posted on 1/22/13 at 10:14 am to brass2mouth
That would suck for BP.
Posted on 1/22/13 at 10:42 am to brass2mouth
quote:
the federal law, the way its written is retarded
agree
quote:
BP goes out and shoots ducks for 6 days, limits each day
the way I shoot we are really getting hypothetical here
quote:
BP ends up being ticketed/jailed for over possession limit ducks
quote:
Makes sense(kind of)?
No because none of the ducks were taken illegally. I would have had no more of a negative eefect on the duck population than a guy who shot a limit every day and ate all of them every day.
Shouldn't the burden of proof be on the GW that I took more than I should have on any given day?
That is not to say I don't understand the law as written, I just dont understand why it is written that way. The intent of the law should be to conserve a resource while promoting the sport and this clearly does not hit that mark.
What if I dontated the duck to a friend who is down and out? He does not hunt, he can not buy a license, he and his family are broke and hungry. According to the law he is above the possession limit. Stupid!
Also how does this apply to mounts? If I have a two day possession of ducks in the freezer and 6 mounts on the wall wouldn't I be over the possession limit per the letter of the law?
What about ducks that are sitting in pot of gumbo on the stove? Do they count toward the possession limit?
ETA: I did not think GW needed a warrant.
This post was edited on 1/22/13 at 10:43 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News