Started By
Message

re: Paging Daylower---duck hunting question

Posted on 1/22/13 at 10:06 am to
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
19752 posts
Posted on 1/22/13 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Bleeding purple



Everybody knows the federal law, the way its written is retarded, but for the sake of argument lets make a kind of hypothetical scenario.

BP goes out and shoots ducks for 6 days, limits each day, cleans the ducks, puts them in the freezer.

Somewhere along the way BP turns outlaw and theres enough evidence of outlawing deer or something stacked up against him for a search warrant. GW searched BP's house/freezer and finds all the ducks along with say a couple illegal deer.

BP ends up being ticketed/jailed for over possession limit ducks, and the for the illegal deer. Makes sense(kind of)?
Posted by wickowick
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
45842 posts
Posted on 1/22/13 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Somewhere along the way BP turns outlaw and theres enough evidence of outlawing deer or something stacked up against him for a search warrant. GW searched BP's house/freezer and finds all the ducks along with say a couple illegal deer.


How often does this happen?
Posted by JAB528
The Mexican Ocean
Member since Jun 2012
16870 posts
Posted on 1/22/13 at 10:14 am to
That would suck for BP.
Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25315 posts
Posted on 1/22/13 at 10:42 am to
quote:

the federal law, the way its written is retarded


agree

quote:

BP goes out and shoots ducks for 6 days, limits each day


the way I shoot we are really getting hypothetical here

quote:

BP ends up being ticketed/jailed for over possession limit ducks
quote:

Makes sense(kind of)?



No because none of the ducks were taken illegally. I would have had no more of a negative eefect on the duck population than a guy who shot a limit every day and ate all of them every day.
Shouldn't the burden of proof be on the GW that I took more than I should have on any given day?

That is not to say I don't understand the law as written, I just dont understand why it is written that way. The intent of the law should be to conserve a resource while promoting the sport and this clearly does not hit that mark.

What if I dontated the duck to a friend who is down and out? He does not hunt, he can not buy a license, he and his family are broke and hungry. According to the law he is above the possession limit. Stupid!






Also how does this apply to mounts? If I have a two day possession of ducks in the freezer and 6 mounts on the wall wouldn't I be over the possession limit per the letter of the law?

What about ducks that are sitting in pot of gumbo on the stove? Do they count toward the possession limit?





ETA: I did not think GW needed a warrant.

This post was edited on 1/22/13 at 10:43 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram