- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/19/13 at 3:16 pm to Jcorye1
You use a bottle I bring a knife
you use a knife
I bring gun.
Untouchables?
Some Chicago gangland stuff.
you use a knife
I bring gun.
Untouchables?
Some Chicago gangland stuff.
This post was edited on 1/19/13 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 1/19/13 at 3:20 pm to dominustd
quote:
y'all's narrative of self-defense
As opposed to the narrative: famous person is charged with a crime there fore he must be guilty.
Posted on 1/19/13 at 3:25 pm to Jcorye1
Im trying to figure out if the OP is mad at Lewis for having thug POS friends or for actually carrying out the crime.
Just having thug POS friends should be a federal offense IMO. Lock em up and throw away the key.
Just having thug POS friends should be a federal offense IMO. Lock em up and throw away the key.
Posted on 1/19/13 at 3:31 pm to Antiheroaz
OP is a genius. Found not guiltt in the court of law equals guilt without a shadow kf a doubt. Becauae famous people get away with cromes because theyre famous. Lol like people wouldnt wanna lockup a famous person even more to set an example
Posted on 1/19/13 at 3:31 pm to Antiheroaz
OP is a genius. Found not guiltt in the court of law equals guilt without a shadow kf a doubt. Becauae famous people get away with cromes because theyre famous. Lol like people wouldnt wanna lockup a famous person even more to set an example
Posted on 1/19/13 at 3:39 pm to sgallo3
Your punctation and grammar didnt get any better in the second post.
I am disappoint.
So He didnt actually kill anyone and from what Ive gathered here wasnt accused of actually killing anyone. Yet OP cant pull for him because he was involved in bar fight that involved Thug POS , alcohol and weapons. Arguments of association rarely make much sense.
I am disappoint.
So He didnt actually kill anyone and from what Ive gathered here wasnt accused of actually killing anyone. Yet OP cant pull for him because he was involved in bar fight that involved Thug POS , alcohol and weapons. Arguments of association rarely make much sense.
This post was edited on 1/19/13 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 1/19/13 at 3:49 pm to Antiheroaz
quote:
So He didnt actually kill anyone and from what Ive gathered here wasnt accused of actually killing anyone. Yet OP cant pull for him because he was involved in bar fight that involved Thug POS , alcohol and weapons. Arguments of association rarely make much sense.
He wouldn't be my friend if you went and killed someone.
Guilty by CoD association
Posted on 1/19/13 at 4:32 pm to dominustd
quote:
That's not what happened in this case. Not at all. You are clearly reaching here.
1. Why do you keep acting like you know what happened?
2. Why do you discount any pro-Lewis evidence and witness recounts, but take every anti-Lewis recount as pure fact? Honest question, it's very strange.
It's been mentioned multiple times that Lewis was said to be trying to break up the fight, and you ignore that part every single time.
Posted on 1/19/13 at 4:33 pm to dominustd
quote:No, you SEE and KNOW only the evidence against Lewis. You toss aside all of the other stuff.
You neither, but I do SEE and KNOW by what I read about the case/testimonies.
quote:So, anyone with an extensive criminal background can't ever act in self defense? They're always in the wrong, that's what you're saying here.
he two defendants had extensive criminal backgrounds yet we are to believe they acted in self-defense
quote:This from the guy ignoring ALL of the pro-Lewis evidence
so you have to dodge, deflect, make excuses, etc.
Posted on 1/19/13 at 5:10 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
ay what you will but he's a bad arse concession stand worker.
Posted on 1/19/13 at 11:56 pm to shel311
quote:
1. Why do you keep acting like you know what happened?
I know it wasn't self defense and the victim did NOT come at them with a cut open bottle as you try to speculate. You fail.
quote:
2. Why do you discount any pro-Lewis evidence and witness recounts, but take every anti-Lewis recount as pure fact? Honest question, it's very strange.
Did I ever say in this thread Lewis stabbed or punched anybody? He was only guilty of obstruction.
quote:
It's been mentioned multiple times that Lewis was said to be trying to break up the fight, and you ignore that part every single time.
You are a liar. Look at my posts you dumbass. I never said Lewis was guilty of murder.
Lewis is guilty of hanging w/ thugs who killed a couple of innocents guys and helped cover his friends asses.
Yeah, a great leader.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 12:04 am to shel311
quote:
No, you SEE and KNOW only the evidence against Lewis. You toss aside all of the other stuff.
Did I say Lewis stabbed or punched anybody dumbass? Link it?
quote:
So, anyone with an extensive criminal background can't ever act in self defense? They're always in the wrong, that's what you're saying here.
They did NOT act in self defense otherwise you would provide links/quotes suggesting otherwise, but you can't.
You will reach for your narrative.
quote:
This from the guy ignoring ALL of the pro-Lewis evidence
I have ignored nothing. You Lewis arse-lickers do indeed ignore the evidence his group killed two guys for no good reason...murder. And the murderers got away with it.
Got to love it. Heroes, all of them. Celebrate.
This post was edited on 1/20/13 at 12:06 am
Posted on 1/20/13 at 12:06 am to dominustd
quote:
Lewis is guilty of hanging w/ thugs who killed a couple of thugs
fixed it for you
Posted on 1/20/13 at 12:09 am to TigerBait1127
quote:
Lewis is guilty of hanging w/ thugs who killed a couple of thugs
fixed it for you
You find that ok.
I owned your arse in this thread and you come back with that.
Fitting.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 12:11 am to dominustd
quote:
I owned your arse in this thread a
when did that happen?
Posted on 1/20/13 at 12:16 am to TigerBait1127
quote:
when did that happen?
Your above quote. Trying to be naive, eh.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 12:18 am to dominustd
quote:
Your above quote. Trying to be naive, eh.
please, show me where it happened.
Was it when you said they didn't know where the shots came from even though the casings were next to the victims (implying that they may have came from the limo)?
Was it when you said that a bottle isn't a weapon?
Was it when you linked evidence from a trial in a different state that hasn't even reached a verdict yet?
Was it when you said they had NO case for self-defense when it was extremely easy to see where a case from self-defense came from?
I would love to know when it was
This post was edited on 1/20/13 at 12:20 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News