- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
Posted on 1/12/13 at 11:45 pm to AustinKnight
Posted on 1/12/13 at 11:45 pm to AustinKnight
Hill had a great second half of his first season. He's no Faulk though. He isn't even Addai.
ETA: Not saying he can't be, but he's not really close yet. He's a great runner, but Addai and especially Faulk had more to their game.
ETA: Not saying he can't be, but he's not really close yet. He's a great runner, but Addai and especially Faulk had more to their game.
This post was edited on 1/12/13 at 11:47 pm
1
Posted on 1/13/13 at 12:02 am to Srbtiger06
I think the well-roundedness of Hill's game is underrated. the coaches were bringing him in for pass protection situations before they really started featuring him as a runner, and he can catch.
he's an intriguing talent to say the least.
he's an intriguing talent to say the least.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News