- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: over/under 3000 yards for Mett in 2013
Posted on 1/9/13 at 12:47 pm to iliveinabox
Posted on 1/9/13 at 12:47 pm to iliveinabox
Under
0
Posted on 1/9/13 at 12:48 pm to Choctaw
I would say over.
Posted on 1/9/13 at 12:48 pm to TheBaker
quote:
With a more coordinated offensive scheme...over. With the same shite...slightly under, but over this years numbers
Posted on 1/9/13 at 1:04 pm to Choctaw
Over, if we throw a little more. And if he won't miss those deep passes, he is guarenteed to throw for over 3,000. 
Posted on 1/9/13 at 1:16 pm to Choctaw
WAY OVER.
The reasons:
-Our whole offense is back, including all his favorite receivers and our Oline should be improved.
-Our defense won't be as good so we will have to score more i.e. put the ball in the air.
-Mett will try and kill it next year to get paid in the draft.
The reasons:
-Our whole offense is back, including all his favorite receivers and our Oline should be improved.
-Our defense won't be as good so we will have to score more i.e. put the ball in the air.
-Mett will try and kill it next year to get paid in the draft.
Posted on 1/9/13 at 1:26 pm to TheCaterpillar
i like the way you think
Posted on 1/9/13 at 1:28 pm to Choctaw
Under
If he plays the same he will have about the same yardage
If he improves, a couple of these close games will be well in hand and we won't be passing
If he plays the same he will have about the same yardage
If he improves, a couple of these close games will be well in hand and we won't be passing
Posted on 1/9/13 at 1:55 pm to Choctaw
shite, with all the drops in the first half alone he might have gone over 3K. Certainly would have gotten close.
I'm still not sure how the hell he got over 2500 with this offense
I'm taking the under for now, but obviously hoping for the former!
I'm still not sure how the hell he got over 2500 with this offense
I'm taking the under for now, but obviously hoping for the former!
Posted on 1/9/13 at 2:16 pm to Choctaw
If we continue to throw the ball at the same rate that would require him to improve to 65% completions. That seems doable.
Over
Over
Posted on 1/9/13 at 2:56 pm to Choctaw
In the first 5 games, I'd guesstimate the WRs dropped 400 yards total.
Posted on 1/9/13 at 4:04 pm to Choctaw
To me it's a no brainer over if a few things, that can be fixable, happens:
The drops were abnormal and have never seen something on that level for any team(think they kind of fixed it after the bye week)
Consistently overthrowing the deep man, again very abnormal(with half of those completed, he's sitting at 3000 and 20+ TDs this year).
OL is experienced except for the most important part(get a perfect fit here, and we are back on top)
Travin Dural, Quantavious Leslie, Avery Johnson(all 6'2"+, two 4.4 speed(Leslie 6'4" 4.5 speed), all will be here.)
Even if his horrendous pocket awareness continues(99% sure it will) He'll still be one of the best QBs in the nation.
The drops were abnormal and have never seen something on that level for any team(think they kind of fixed it after the bye week)
Consistently overthrowing the deep man, again very abnormal(with half of those completed, he's sitting at 3000 and 20+ TDs this year).
OL is experienced except for the most important part(get a perfect fit here, and we are back on top)
Travin Dural, Quantavious Leslie, Avery Johnson(all 6'2"+, two 4.4 speed(Leslie 6'4" 4.5 speed), all will be here.)
Even if his horrendous pocket awareness continues(99% sure it will) He'll still be one of the best QBs in the nation.
This post was edited on 1/9/13 at 4:11 pm
Posted on 1/9/13 at 4:14 pm to Choctaw
Exactly 3000 
Posted on 1/9/13 at 4:40 pm to Choctaw
Over...calling it 3200 yards 17 TDs 5 TOs
We're going to need to score like this to win more than 7 games in 2013.
We're going to need to score like this to win more than 7 games in 2013.
Posted on 1/9/13 at 5:13 pm to TheBaker
quote:
With a more coordinated offensive scheme...over. With the same shite...slightly under, but over this years numbers
And hes prob closer to the number you are thinking without all the dropped passes.
Id say over, but you guys will never make up your mind. The more mett throws, the more plays that takes from hill and blue.
This post was edited on 1/9/13 at 5:14 pm
Posted on 1/10/13 at 4:41 am to dgnx6
quote:
Id say over, but you guys will never make up your mind. The more mett throws, the more plays that takes from hill and blue.
No it wont. I looked up Wisconsin a few days back. Around the same amount of throws as us and their starting RB had over 300(356) carries. Their second had over a hundred(125), and their third over 60(62). Thing is, we don't get enough first downs and it has to take a miracle of God for us to drive the ball more than sixty yards. Also add to the fact that we had 7 ball carriers with at least 20 carries compared to other teams 3, 4, or 5.
This post was edited on 1/10/13 at 4:50 am
Posted on 1/10/13 at 6:47 am to Datbayoubengal
Mett throws for fewer yards next year than this year.
Until I see a change in philosophy, I am predicting the same ol' shite.
Until I see a change in philosophy, I am predicting the same ol' shite.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 6:52 am to LuckySo-n-So
quote:
Until I see a change in philosophy, I am predicting the same ol' shite.
i guess you think we still did the whole run, run, pass thing last season, right?
Posted on 1/10/13 at 6:57 am to LuckySo-n-So
quote:We changed in philosophy this year.
Mett throws for fewer yards next year than this year.
Until I see a change in philosophy, I am predicting the same ol' shite.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 6:58 am to Choctaw
Under
Posted on 1/10/13 at 7:03 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
WAY OVER.
The reasons:
-Our whole offense is back, including all his favorite receivers and our Oline should be improved.
-Our defense won't be as good so we will have to score more i.e. put the ball in the air.
-Mett will try and kill it next year to get paid in the draft.
This.
And I'll add the fact that we are going to have a much more diverse group of receivers that may actually be able to create separation downfield with Dural, Johnson, great young TEs, and hopefully at least one of the JUCO guys.
That will allow Jarvis and Odell to work in the slot, which is what they actually do well.
Also, with the D losses, I could see higher scoring games on both sides of the ball.
If he stays healthy, I think Mett will easily be closer to 4000 than 3000
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News