Started By
Message

re: Doing LES with more.....

Posted on 1/3/13 at 6:04 pm to
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

Is the recruiting rank based on offensive players only?


No, and I should have specified that in the OP. I couldnt find offensive player class ranks easily available for this quick exercise.

however, as all teams must recruit both offense AND defense, making an argument that we dont recruit offensive players isnt dissuading the trend in the data.

I will do a defensive one when I have time.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31968 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

Is the recruiting rank based on offensive players only?

quote:

No


well frick that makes this kind of useless than, no? I mean we always have top recruiting classes based mostly on the defensive studs we recruit. I know we still get a lot of great Offensive recruits but we get way more defensively


eta: I'm not saying we aren't underachieving, but it's not by as much as this chart would suggest
This post was edited on 1/3/13 at 6:09 pm
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

however, as all teams must recruit both offense AND defense, making an argument that we dont recruit offensive players isnt dissuading the trend in the data.


Do all teams recruit offensive an defensive players at the same rate?

This graph is useless. Everyone know the offense has struggled. Everyone knows recruiting rankings are not an exact as well.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram