Started By
Message

re: England and WC 2014

Posted on 12/20/12 at 10:35 pm to
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 12/20/12 at 10:35 pm to
Yea Ribery wants the ball played to his feet while Walcott wants to run onto it. It's unfair to compare them.
Posted by glassman
Next to the beer taps at Finn's
Member since Oct 2008
116256 posts
Posted on 12/20/12 at 10:38 pm to
You remeber the absolute shite the pitch conditions were last year at the San Siro? That was all about Theo.
Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 12/21/12 at 2:22 am to
I don't care about playing style. While struggling for Arsenal, Walcott has been a key contributor for England. We aren't talking about FUT here. Ribery is 10x him in value, regardless of dissimilarities in the way they play. But get off this clown France tangent and actually give real arguments about England's talent, because none have been made so far.

I like Wilshere and think he has great upside, but this talk of him being able to carry the team is dum. He's not a bad player at all. But this thread was built on the premise that England is supposed to be able to play with anyone in the world. The fact that Germany has several CAMs way better than supposedly England's biggest gamechanger should be a cause for concern.
This post was edited on 12/21/12 at 2:31 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram