- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: John Curtis vs. Rummel
Posted on 12/11/12 at 9:32 am to GhostofJackson
Posted on 12/11/12 at 9:32 am to GhostofJackson
quote:
Other programs will suffer
Hahaaa there it is. I guess y'all really believe this.
All the boys programs draw kids that play football, it's quite a large talent pool.
JC softball would compete in 5a. Girls go there to play just like football
So that's a horrible excuse.
4
Posted on 12/11/12 at 9:36 am to Lester Earl
quote:
Hahaaa there it is. I guess y'all really believe this.
All the boys programs draw kids that play football, it's quite a large talent pool.
JC softball would compete in 5a. Girls go there to play just like football
So that's a horrible excuse.
Girls basketball is struggling right now in 2a, even though they won a title last year, but that was their first. Baseball hasn't won in a decade, boys basketball, with all these football players you are saying contribute to the team, won their FIRST TITLE EVER last year, softball is good, but that is because those girls play year round and dont do any other sports at Curtis (which hurts the pool for the other sports), wrestling hasn't won a title, and track can compete with the small schools but wouldn't be able to beat the top 5a schools, even with all those football players that you think are so magnificent.
Posted on 12/11/12 at 9:39 am to Lester Earl
quote:
Other programs will suffer
Hahaaa there it is. I guess y'all really believe this.
All the boys programs draw kids that play football, it's quite a large talent pool.
JC softball would compete in 5a. Girls go there to play just like football
So that's a horrible excuse.
then why did some 5a programs go ape shite when curtis wanted to play 5a football.. and the whole play in your class war started...
and you know which schools that was... make no mistake about it.
Posted on 12/11/12 at 9:58 am to Lester Earl
Lester the molester, just when I thought I was starting to like you and you were beginning to be reasonable. Ok, do me a favor. Take all of Rummel's enrollment and chop it down to 15% of what it is now and now take 5% of that and make it girls from Chapelle. Now play on the 5A level and go get em Champ! Let's see how bright that light blue color shines!?
Posted on 12/11/12 at 10:41 am to Lester Earl
quote:
JC softball would compete in 5a. Girls go there to play just like football
They were good with Brignac, not so much now. They could still compete in 5a with alot of schools, don't think they'd win state though.
Not bashing Curtis, I visited the school before my son and daughter reached high school age. It would have been a good fit for him but they don't play soccer (although they talked about needing kickers), he would still have had baseball. For daughter, it was no way due to academics. Decided to keep them at home in public school (lucky enough to have good public schools here). With all of the AP and Honors courses she's getting as good an education as the Catholic schools could offer.....and no cost.
This post was edited on 12/11/12 at 10:48 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News