Started By
Message
locked post

Reality Check: 3 SEC teams won 11 games, 6 SEC teams won 10 games

Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:37 am
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57495 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:37 am
So does a 10 win season REALLY mean that much now-a-days? When was then last time 6 SEC teams won >= 10 games (or any conference for that matter)?

It seems as if we are being hypnotized into being simply "good" but not "great".
Posted by BOZ4LSU
A place
Member since Jan 2012
2392 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:38 am to
quote:

does a 10 win season REALLY mean that much


yes
Posted by White Shadeaux
In the nicest parts of hell
Member since Jan 2006
24114 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:39 am to
quote:

So does a 10 win season REALLY mean that much now-a-days?



Ask the other 8 SEC teams.
Posted by LSUdm21
Member since Nov 2008
17486 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:40 am to
Now tell me how many of those teams did all of that after losing a starting LT, RT, RG, RB, 2 LBs, CB/PR, had 21 players miss 1 or more games throughout the year.


What Les did this year is special no matter how you tards want to paint it.
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:40 am to
Would you want to trade places with Auburn, Tennessee or Arkansas???
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:41 am to
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
80349 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:41 am to
We are the sixth best team in the nation, yet only 4th best in our conference.

The term "falling back into the pack" pretty much has a new definition in the SEC.
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:42 am to
it would mean more if we had a 8 team playoff.


oh to dream...
Posted by nycajun
Nothin' could be finer.....
Member since Dec 2004
18183 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:42 am to
6 SEC teams in the top 10 in the country. 3 of them had 10 wins. If you think that's "simply good", you're not living in the real world.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:42 am to
yep winning ten games isn't the same any more because 1. there are more games and 2. usually ooc schedule is light meaning you only need 5 or 6 sec wins to make it to ten on the year. win your four ooc games and then either go 6-2 or 5-3 and win your bowl and you have 10 wins.

still good but its not the same as it has been the past.

I dont think we have slipped to good yet but another few years without a nc and its likely we have gone from great to good.

fwiw i think we did pretty well to get 10 wins and probably 11 this year considering the amount of injuries and stuff off the field that hit this team. The frustrating part was the games we lost and stupid struggles vs auburn,towson,ole miss and arky.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34531 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:43 am to


Hypno Toad says 10-2 is good enough for you.
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:43 am to
So what you're saying is there are 6 really good teams separated by 1 game? Well that is certainly shocking.
Posted by bigpetedatiga
Alexandria, LA
Member since Aug 2009
8633 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:44 am to
Pineapples... i don't like it!
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6418 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:46 am to
Reality Check: 2 SEC teams won 8 games, 5 SEC teams won fewer than 6.
quote:

When was then last time 6 SEC teams won >= 10 games (or any conference for that matter)?

5 did it last year, with two fewer teams in the conference.
Posted by ScottieP
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2004
1933 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:49 am to
Yes and No

First off when you think of 10 win seasons in the '90's it was in a 11 game regular season schedule.

Then again looking back at past seasons you include the bowl game.

So in 1996 LSU went 10-2. This included the bowl game.

I guess what I am trying to say is: a 10 win season in the '90s equals a 11 win season after the bowl game now a days.
Posted by rsande2
Member since Jan 2006
3423 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:49 am to
quote:

So does a 10 win season REALLY mean that much now-a-days?


I guess it depends on who you beat and who you lost too. We beat 9 and 10 and lost to 2 and 4 and killed washington who beat stanford. UF and UA were one score games as well. I would say this was a solid season. Also UGA is ranked ahead of us but I am not sure they are "better" than us. In a playoff, no one would want to play us this year....
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25348 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:53 am to
quote:

So does a 10 win season REALLY mean that much now-a-days? When was then last time 6 SEC teams won >= 10 games (or any conference for that matter)?

It seems as if we are being hypnotized into being simply "good" but not "great".



Reality check: the 10 win barometer isn't impressive in a single-season vacuum. Look at the overall body of work with that benchmark. Double digit wins is a barometer of long term success, not necessarily short term success (unless you are a Mississippi school).
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:54 am to
quote:

It seems as if we are being hypnotized into being simply "good" but not "great".


nice try. i don't think we are being hypnotized or even happy or even complacent. the way the SEC is 6 teams are damn good football teams and it is a meat grinder. these 6 teams LOST only 9 games and THEY LOST THEM TO EACH OTHER. each year, it's basically a break here, a break there, a fumble here or there or an injuriy here or there that separate these teams. this year, LSU lost some key players at key positions and then suffered the worst string of injuries i have ever seen (to starters). all of this while breaking in a new qb and average wr's. all of the affected players have stepped up and improved their game so it bodes well for next year.

winning 10 games in the SEC is hard to do and LSU came damn close to winning 11 or 12.
Posted by Pauldean
Red Stick by way of Syracuse
Member since Oct 2011
2629 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 11:56 am to
Anybody figure out the OP's point yet?

Lulled to complacency by 10 win seasons? LOL

How 'bout this: 10-2 in SEC>>>>>10-2 any other conference.
Every top ten team is gonna be 4-0 out of conference. So yes, 6-2 in this conference is great.

Prefer 7-1 or 8-0? Yes.
Complacent with 6-2? No. I doubt anyone associated with the program is happy or complacent with 6-2 SEC record.

ETA: LSU GrandDad beat me to it.
This post was edited on 11/26/12 at 11:59 am
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73634 posts
Posted on 11/26/12 at 12:00 pm to
When you factor in in the schedule differences it makes sense. Of the top 6, UGA had the easiest SEC schedule, followed by Bama, then Florida. There are your 1-loss teams. SOS is huge when this many good teams are in the same conference. This LSU team had a very good season IMO. Just came up a little short against two very good teams and got hurt in the end by the conference schedule.
This post was edited on 11/26/12 at 12:01 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram