- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/9/12 at 12:58 pm to droman225
quote:You would "assume?"
I would assume because they were interacting with you before they were banned
So what you're saying is you're talking about something you really don't know anything about.
Also, how would these people you "heard" about know who banned them? Do you have any idea how many admins there are on the Poli Board?
I'm not trying to argue with you. I'm trying to get you to think about what you're saying.
These people you "heard" from. They all complained about being banned. And in their eyes they are completely innocent of any wrong doing. Do you think it's possible that there's more to the story that what they're telling you? In other words, that there are two sides to the story?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News