- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tyrann Mathieu to be featured on cover of Sports Illustrated...
Posted on 10/16/12 at 10:54 am to Mr. Hangover
Posted on 10/16/12 at 10:54 am to Mr. Hangover
quote:
but the article says
Mathieu has allowed his image to be used on a flyer promoting an event at a local night club, appeared in several promotional videos online and, multiple sources told SI, received benefits at the club that could affect his eligibility
The Mathieu allowed his image part is all an assumption by the writer. He also comments that Freak and Claiborne were on there, both of whom said they either had no knowledge of the party or didn't attend.
Mathieu didn't gain any benefits from anything claimed in the article other than free entrance into a VIP section of a club.
The writer also makes his judgments based of a complaince officer that has "no knowledge of the Mathieu situation"
Basically it's the same thing Alabama was facing in the Menswear case last year. A minor violation with no eligibility at risk.
Posted on 10/16/12 at 11:01 am to EarthwormJim
quote:
The Mathieu allowed his image part is all an assumption by the writer. He also comments that Freak and Claiborne were on there, both of whom said they either had no knowledge of the party or didn't attend.
Mathieu didn't gain any benefits from anything claimed in the article other than free entrance into a VIP section of a club.
The writer also makes his judgments based of a complaince officer that has "no knowledge of the Mathieu situation"
Basically it's the same thing Alabama was facing in the Menswear case last year. A minor violation with no eligibility at risk.
Yep, basically this is the SI writer trying to make something out of nothing which he is clearly doing based on the responses in this thread.
Posted on 10/16/12 at 11:09 am to EarthwormJim
quote:
Basically it's the same thing Alabama was facing in the Menswear case last year. A minor violation with no eligibility at risk.
ok, gotcha..
basically all tyrann has to say is that he didn't even know that his picture was on the flyer and he should be ok, right?
another thing, why are club owners/promoters around here 'ratting' on the players?? are they not LSU fans? you would think they would give the NCAA the run around if they had to, but that don't seem to be the case
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News