Started By
Message

re: TDBBL Rule Changes Thread-

Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:39 pm to
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279356 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:39 pm to
Yea, that's true. And last year was weird cause of the lockout anyway.

A lot of reactionary rules because of that.

Let's set a smaller cap on FA acquisitions and be done with it. That will settle the biggest issue. This is the red headed step child league anyway, no need for a rule street turn. It's all a crapshoot in the end anyway
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78187 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

red headed step child


Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425100 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Let's set a smaller cap on FA acquisitions and be done with it.

agreed

and for IR, let's just add one roster spot. then cap off the transactions at 3 or 4

i don't think we get 75% to deal with the "FA during playoffs" rule, either way
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 1:51 pm to
I think we just need to determine the number per week. I propose 4 but would be OK with 3. What does everyone else think?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram