Started By
Message

re: Which is most important--good coaching or talented football players?

Posted on 9/20/12 at 2:02 pm to
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59164 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 2:02 pm to
When the talent is equal, coaching matters, what people don't realize is the difference between top coaches is marginal. LSU would not have won nearly as many games as we have if Les was a "bad" or even avg coach. Ron Zook could recruit like a muther, but wasn't a good coach.
This post was edited on 9/20/12 at 2:03 pm
Posted by stapuffmarshy
lower 9
Member since Apr 2010
17507 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 2:09 pm to
the answer to this question is right in front of most of your faces and you keep ignoring it.

Two football teams in the South had great seasons last year. Neither won a championship but they had really solid top of their league seasons


The coaches of both of those football teams were told to go away and not come back ever and for one year.


Where do those two football teams stand today??

one is 1-2 in college and the other is 0-2 in the pros


pretty clear IMO but keep going back to CLM is avg and all the other nonsense

talent factors in but is not the main factor. it's coaching plain and simple. like water is wet
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

When the talent is equal, coaching matters, what people don't realize is the difference between top coaches is marginal. LSU would not have won nearly as many games as we have if Les was a "bad" or even avg coach. Ron Zook could recruit like a muther, but wasn't a good coach.


And when the coaching is equal, talent matters.

In fact, when coaching is UNequal, talent matter.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram