- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
![locked post](https://www.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/lock.gif)
Effect of Trent Richardson's absence in the Alabama Game
Posted on 9/19/12 at 8:19 pm
Posted on 9/19/12 at 8:19 pm
I know this is Auburn week and we still have a long ways to go for the game.But i can't help it.So here goes.
During both of the games we had with the gumps last year the defensive staff had to game plan for Richardson and there was probably lot of effort in terms of game planning to prevent him from breaking big run.
With him gone to the NFL,even if Bama has good backs i don't think none of them are in the same league as Trent.So i think our D will defenitely fare better against the Gumps this year.
During both of the games we had with the gumps last year the defensive staff had to game plan for Richardson and there was probably lot of effort in terms of game planning to prevent him from breaking big run.
With him gone to the NFL,even if Bama has good backs i don't think none of them are in the same league as Trent.So i think our D will defenitely fare better against the Gumps this year.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 8:20 pm to tiger1980
Trent wasn't even part of the gameplan on 1/9
Posted on 9/19/12 at 8:22 pm to tiger1980
They are more balanced and have better recievers this year.
Different team.
Different team.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 8:22 pm to tiger1980
Trent Richardson was nearly a non-factor in January.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 8:31 pm to tiger1980
I try to be as non-biased as possible but that just isn't correct. In my opinion, Lacy is even better than Richardson. Richardson was kind of overrated.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 8:33 pm to tiger1980
Trent Richardson in the running game was a non-factor his career at Alabama vs LSU.
He was more dangerous out of the backfield on passes then he was running.
I think he only had 1 TD on the ground against us. And it came late in the 4th quarter after our defense lived on the field.
He was more dangerous out of the backfield on passes then he was running.
I think he only had 1 TD on the ground against us. And it came late in the 4th quarter after our defense lived on the field.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 8:38 pm to tiger1980
You guys are still upset over the arse whooping bama gave us last January. Two totally different teams this year,we will whoop that Bama arse! Don't lose any more sleep!
Posted on 9/19/12 at 8:55 pm to tiger1980
People over-value skill positions in the college game. Their run blocking is fricking outstanding no matter who is in the backfield and Lacy is more than capable.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 9:00 pm to tiger1980
Bama has capable backs. Don't kid yourself.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 9:00 pm to tiger1980
Trent put the nail in our coffin, they kicked field goals and yes, they scored touch downs.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 9:50 pm to tiger1980
LSU didn't put any special planning into stopping Trent Richardson. LSU is one of the few schools in college football with NFL caliber athletes to match Alabama. They stopped him in Alabama earlier and basically shut him down in the title game if not for that last run where he scored a TD by bouncing outside after they stuffed the middle. Only reason he scored was you couls see the quit in them knowing the game was over!
Posted on 9/19/12 at 9:57 pm to tiger1980
quote:
i don't think none of them are in the same league as Trent
According to the Gumps Yeldon is better than Richardson. First freshman Heisman.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrolleyes.gif)
Our defense did fine against them except they were on the field too long due to lack of offense. Then eventually lack of hope. Our defense is better and we actually have an offense now so yeah. I don't care who calls us the underdog we ain't losing in Tiger Stadium.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Icongeauxtigers.png)
Posted on 9/19/12 at 10:13 pm to tiger1980
I wonder how some of you people can function at all when you're so focused on one game when we have 5 games before that one. A lot can happen between now and then to either team.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 10:33 pm to tiger1980
It doesnt even matter. They got stud RBs in Lacy, Fowler, Yeldon. They got maulers up front. They have a nasty D. This will remain unchanged for the foreseeable future.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 10:52 pm to tiger1980
Biggest difference in Alabama's offense compared to last year is drastic improvement in red zone efficiency, which I HOPE pays big dividends against LSU. Chavis has been giving Bama fits when they get near the red zone. So far this season, we are 12 of 12 with 11 being touchdowns and one being a field goal.
You'll also notice Bama hasn't really been forcing the issue in the running game and has been focusing on improving down field passing. I'm not sure how it's going to look if and when they need a run heavy approach.
Eddie looked much more hard nosed in the last game. He looked a little tentative in the first two. I'm hoping he's starting to get warmed up.
I don't think Eddie can put us on his back like Richardson. But trying to have Trent do that on Nov. 5 didn't work out too great anyway. That's why he wasn't the focal point of the offense on Jan. 9. Bama Knew LSU was going to take him away, so they gave AJ a bigger role in the game plan.
Trent couldn't carry us to victory and I doubt we expect Eddie too. Expect our RB's to be good enough and utilized enough to keep the D honest. But AJ and red zone performance will be the key to offensive success or failure against LSU.
As for Yeldon, he has the potential to be the best Bama RB of all time, IMO. He's got all the talent needed. But he's got a long way to go.
As for whether Bama is overrated? The offense is awesome. But It's tough to tell how good the defense would be without all the turnovers they have been getting. I hope we keep getting them.
You'll also notice Bama hasn't really been forcing the issue in the running game and has been focusing on improving down field passing. I'm not sure how it's going to look if and when they need a run heavy approach.
Eddie looked much more hard nosed in the last game. He looked a little tentative in the first two. I'm hoping he's starting to get warmed up.
I don't think Eddie can put us on his back like Richardson. But trying to have Trent do that on Nov. 5 didn't work out too great anyway. That's why he wasn't the focal point of the offense on Jan. 9. Bama Knew LSU was going to take him away, so they gave AJ a bigger role in the game plan.
Trent couldn't carry us to victory and I doubt we expect Eddie too. Expect our RB's to be good enough and utilized enough to keep the D honest. But AJ and red zone performance will be the key to offensive success or failure against LSU.
As for Yeldon, he has the potential to be the best Bama RB of all time, IMO. He's got all the talent needed. But he's got a long way to go.
As for whether Bama is overrated? The offense is awesome. But It's tough to tell how good the defense would be without all the turnovers they have been getting. I hope we keep getting them.
This post was edited on 9/19/12 at 10:57 pm
Posted on 9/20/12 at 3:17 am to tiger1980
quote:
don't think none of them
Jesus... smh
Posted on 9/20/12 at 6:44 am to tiger1980
Richardson > Ingram > Lacy
Yeldon is a different type of back and he will be dangerous in the open field and on passes out of the backfield. He may prove to be the most dangerous all around back of the bunch. But hard to beat the shear brute strength of Richardson head to head.
Yeldon is a different type of back and he will be dangerous in the open field and on passes out of the backfield. He may prove to be the most dangerous all around back of the bunch. But hard to beat the shear brute strength of Richardson head to head.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)