- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pagano to Clemson
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:31 pm to Toughcrittercrumb1
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:31 pm to Toughcrittercrumb1
Bama is the school that's getting a hose job by Clemson. Little Nicky and his psycho alum will turn Clemson in soon enough. 
0
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:46 pm to Codythetiger
I would rather see highly regarded DL's or any players at any position choose Clemson than 'Bama, Florida or other SEC schools. You can't sign them all. Sometimes we need to acknowledge that there are other top notch recruiters out there, like Dabo Sweeney. So far, he has not translated that recruiting success to huge success on the field, so if he can hang on to the likes of Pagano and Nkemniche, we'll see how he fares.
LSU has quite an impressive haul of DL's so far, with players like Tim Williams still being recruited, so it is still going to be a great group of DL recruits for Coach Miles.
LSU has quite an impressive haul of DL's so far, with players like Tim Williams still being recruited, so it is still going to be a great group of DL recruits for Coach Miles.
This post was edited on 7/24/12 at 10:47 pm
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:48 pm to rjokerlsu
cmonnnn beckwith williams willis gilmore & rsj for the last spots
Posted on 7/24/12 at 10:58 pm to lsufanva
quote:
We accuse Saban of being dirty but yet at the same time we believe he was clean at LSU?
Why would anyone suspect he was dirty at LSU? It's got to be easy to recruit a championship team to a school that had losing records in 7 years of the decade prior to your arrival.
Posted on 7/24/12 at 11:43 pm to sunnydaze
He's heading there to prove he is better than RN
Posted on 7/25/12 at 12:09 am to sunnydaze
Posted on 7/25/12 at 12:38 am to LSUTil_iDie
Seems pretty obvious now that he decided on Clemson a long time ago. Just wanted to see the sights. Fla. and LSU were apparently never anything more than a sight seeing trip. I doubt money was a factor in his recruiting. Others yes but probably not Pagano.
Posted on 7/25/12 at 5:35 am to sunnydaze
Posted on 7/25/12 at 5:46 am to culsutiger
quote:
Why would anyone suspect he was dirty at LSU? It's got to be easy to recruit a championship team to a school that had losing records in 7 years of the decade prior to your arrival.
Shhhh everyone BUT LSU is dirty.
Posted on 7/25/12 at 6:26 am to FootballNostradamus
quote:
Pagano to Clemson
:shrug:
Posted on 7/25/12 at 8:25 am to Toughcrittercrumb1
quote:
plus some other prospects will make a name for themselves during the season
Very True. Nobody even knew who Benny Logan was until after his senior year. He came out of no where and now is probably our best DT.
Posted on 7/25/12 at 8:36 am to sunnydaze
I don't feel like we missed on much here. Congrats to Clemson, assuming that everything is legit. Clemson is having to compete with an improved South Carolina program, so there is a ton of pressure for them to pull in some good classes. Not sure exactly what they are doing to achieve that, but it sure is working. I must say, however, that it SEEMS fishy.
Posted on 7/25/12 at 8:52 am to LSU Patrick
Why? Clemson has been a solid football program historically and is on the rise again.
Posted on 7/25/12 at 9:17 am to nhbboy
quote:
Clemson has been a solid football program historically and is on the rise again.
Clemson has had a solid program but it doesn't size up to LSU or Bama especially for a defensive player. If you play on defense and want to go to the NFL LSU and Bama are no brainers.
Posted on 7/25/12 at 9:30 am to jmarto1
LSU and Alabama also have more depth and competition. Clemson can still offer early time (especially on D where they had problems) as they are rebuilding to a higher level again. There is nothing fishy about them getting quality players. Early playing time is the #1 priority for most recruits according to polls.
This post was edited on 7/25/12 at 9:35 am
Posted on 7/25/12 at 9:40 am to nhbboy
Is early playing time always better? A legit defensive player from Bama or LSU is a very high chance of going to the pros. Not that it can't be done at Clemson.
Posted on 7/25/12 at 9:42 am to jmarto1
Early playing time is #1 priority of most recruits period.
Posted on 7/25/12 at 10:01 am to nhbboy
You should be happy Pagano did not commit to LSU.
He is a project, and will need at least two years of coaching to possibly being a contributor.
Much better and much more polished DL possibilities for LSU than Pagano.
He is a project, and will need at least two years of coaching to possibly being a contributor.
Much better and much more polished DL possibilities for LSU than Pagano.
Posted on 7/25/12 at 10:03 am to Trojan Ace
I had written him off to Florida weeks ago. I think him going to Clemson is fine.
Posted on 7/25/12 at 10:06 am to jmarto1
quote:
A legit defensive player from Bama or LSU is a very high chance of going to the pros. Not that it can't be done at Clemson.
The only difference is LSU and Bama send more players to the NFL. An exceptional player will get drafted from ANY school. Clemson cranks out plenty of NFL players.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News