Started By
Message

re: Is Jerrard Randall #2?

Posted on 7/11/12 at 9:50 am to
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
60727 posts
Posted on 7/11/12 at 9:50 am to
quote:

5 or 6 plays won't hurt a thing


Honestly 5 or 6 plays could be the difference in a win and a loss. I've been a big Randall supporter on this site. I've said many times I think he's the next QB when it's all said and done once Mett leaves. That being said, if LSU wants to run the option there are better players. Use Shep, Ware, Magee, or Turner. Shep averaged somewhere around 7.5 YPC in that role as a freshman. Magee and Turner lead their teams to the Dome twice running the option. It's a better change of pace IMO if Mett stays in the game than if you completely take him out. It gives the defense less time to adjust as opposed to him coming out and Randall coming into the game.
Posted by Corndawg
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2012
378 posts
Posted on 7/11/12 at 9:53 am to
JJ27...

Thank you, sometimes common sense ain't so common.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59445 posts
Posted on 7/11/12 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

JJ27


What was the QB situation on the best high school football team you've ever seen?


I'm fine with Randall not playing a down all season, but if the coaches think a play here or there will give us an advantage, I'm fine with that too. Not putting him in for entire drives, but for specific plays. Again, i don't care if they do, but I'm not going to crucify the staff before 1) they've even done it or 2) we haven't seen if it will be successful or not.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram