- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Goodell may be forced to redo punishments for players.
Posted on 6/4/12 at 2:43 pm to Patrick O Rly
Posted on 6/4/12 at 2:43 pm to Patrick O Rly
I'm not going to copy and paste a post I made dissecting his "skepticism" as it regards the NFL and its treatment of the Saints organization and the bounty scandal. Suffice it to say he was insulting other people for being sheep and taking whatever the NFL was feeding them while accepting without question or pause for consideration extremely far-fetched and unreliable blog posts that called into question the evidence against the Saints. He found it inappropriate to rely on the information that the NFL front office put out, but based a number of his posts off of some wildly unreliable blog post crediting a single anonymous source within the Saints organization who claimed to have seen secret e-mails to four separate members of the coaching staff.
I have no position on the Saints bounty investigation. I do have a position on people who accuse others of being sheep for coming to a different conclusion than they have. It's obnoxious. What makes it worse is when the logic that you claim to rely on is full of holes of the exact kind that you accuse the other person's logic of.
I have no position on the Saints bounty investigation. I do have a position on people who accuse others of being sheep for coming to a different conclusion than they have. It's obnoxious. What makes it worse is when the logic that you claim to rely on is full of holes of the exact kind that you accuse the other person's logic of.
This post was edited on 6/4/12 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 6/4/12 at 2:44 pm to RollTigers
quote:
I'm not going to copy and paste a post I made dissecting his "skepticism" as it regards the NFL and its treatment of the Saints organization and the bounty scandal. Suffice it to say he was insulting other people for being sheep and taking whatever the NFL was feeding them while accepting without question or pause for consideration extremely far-fetched and unreliable blog posts that called into question the evidence against the Saints. He found it inappropriate to rely on the information that the NFL front office put out, but based a number of his posts off of some wildly unreliable blog post crediting a single anonymous source within the Saints organizations who claimed to have seen secret e-mails to four separate members of the coaching staff.
I have no position on the Saints bounty investigation. I do have a position on people who accuse others of being sheep for coming to a different conclusion than they have. It's obnoxious. What makes it worse is when the logic that you claim to rely on is full of holes of the exact kind that you accuse the other person's logic of.
my head started hurting at dissecting.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News