- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:31 pm to SaintEB
Oh boy. Well, this should be interesting.
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:31 pm to CocoLoco
from the complaint:
vilma
quote:
18. Goodell did not reveal, and, despite repeated requests from among others, Vilma, has never revealed, any evidence purportedly corroborating that a Bounty Program existed, that Vilma participated in any such Bounty Program, and Goodell’s statements.
19. Goodell did not reveal, and, despite repeated requests from, among others, Vilma, has never revealed, any supposed sources purportedly corroborating that a Bounty Program existed, that Vilma participated in any such Bounty Program, and Goodell’s statements.
vilma
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:36 pm to DBG
Well, this is going to be fun! Can't wait to see the NFL finally be held accountable for their actions.
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:37 pm to DBG
This is great. Vilma truly believes he's innocent without any evidence, so why the frick not? It's getting juicer and juicer.
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:38 pm to DBG
quote:
onathan Vilma has sued Roger Goodell in federal court in Louisiana
If the venue isn't changed Goodell better settle out of court.
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:42 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
If the venue isn't changed Goodell better settle out of court.
I don't think they'd be successful in getting a change
This post was edited on 5/17/12 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:43 pm to TigerinATL
so would Vilma actually be suing the league or Goodell alone?
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:45 pm to DBG
quote:
Jonathan Vilma ?@JonVilma51
As I've said before..I NEVER PAID, NOR INTENDED TO PAY ANY AMOUNT OF MONEY,TO ANY PLAYER FOR INTENTIONALLY HURTING AN OPPONENT.
quote:
Jonathan Vilma ?@JonVilma51
maybe this will get some people attention
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:48 pm to eyeran
Florio notes that, again, Vilma didn't say he never offered money to anyone to hit.
He believes that's Vilma's way of getting around possibly saying something he didn't mean in a normal exaggerated locker room context.
He believes that's Vilma's way of getting around possibly saying something he didn't mean in a normal exaggerated locker room context.
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:50 pm to eyeran
Damn, Vilma throwing bows. Can't wait to see how this plays out
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:53 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
WAFB.com just reported it
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:54 pm to eyeran
CAPS.
STARTING TO GET REAL!!!
STARTING TO GET REAL!!!
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:56 pm to dave11
get em Jon....frick you emperor goodel
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:58 pm to dave11
Good. I hope they take that little shite down. He's a fricking asshat.
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:58 pm to eyeran
quote:
.I NEVER PAID, NOR INTENDED TO PAY ANY AMOUNT OF MONEY,TO ANY PLAYER FOR INTENTIONALLY HURTING AN OPPONENT.
So, I'm not trying to be a dick here. But -- "never paid, nor intended to pay" -- does not actually equate to "A bounty program never existed".
Let's say Vilma is truthful in his statements -- he never intended to pay. But, did he ever OFFER? If he used a "bounty" type payment as enticement to get team mates to play more violent in the hopes of getting recognized - ESPECIALLY if they got more recognition (monetary or otherwise) for cart-offs -- does the fact that he never intended to actually pay up on his offer make this any better?
The truth is most likely somewhere in the middle. Do I think the penalties are too severe -- hell yes. Do I think Roger is simply using the Saints organization to wipe his arse from years of neglected dumps on retired players? Absolutely.
But to think that the Saints are totally innocent in all of this is very narrow-minded.
This post was edited on 5/17/12 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 5/17/12 at 2:58 pm to LakeViewLSU
Duke Williams is a big time plaintiff's attorney, can definitely see why Vilma went with him.
Posted on 5/17/12 at 3:07 pm to BuckToothBilly
quote:
But to think that the Saints are totally innocent in all of this is very narrow-minded.
Vilmas suit not really a method to prove innocence of Saintd as a team
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News